Porno francais milf escort girl porto vecchio

porno francais milf escort girl porto vecchio

De cette proposition, il ressort au paragraphe 3 "What changes to the firearm directive is the Commission proposing today" une évidente contradiction entre le prétexte invoqué l'usage d'armes automatiques illégales et l'objectif réel la prohibition des armes semi-automatiques légales. Les détenteurs d'armes légales, chasseurs, tireurs, collectionneurs comptent sur leur représentation au parlement européen pour ne pas devenir des victimes collatérales du terrorisme et résister à l'influence excessive des personnels non élus de la Commission européenne.

Je suis contre l'interdction des armes semi automatiques. La législation en vigueur est suffisante pour assurer la protection de tous et ces armes ne sont utilisées que dans un cadre sportif. Aucune mauvaise utilisation conduisant à des accidents du type de ceux que l'on voit aux États unis ne sont à déplorer en France. Quel est le rapport entre les jihadistes et les tireurs sportifs, chasseurs et collectionneurs d'armes qui eux respectent la législation en vigueur dans leur pays?

Comme d'habitude vous allez au plus facile!! Encore une initiative facile!! Plutôt que de s'occuper des vrais problèmes, la commission va emmerder les honnêtes citoyens! Tireurs sportifs, chasseurs, collectionneurs etc Pourriez-vous prendre la mesure du problème pour une fois et vous y attaquer serieusement.

Notre ennemie ce n'est pas les citoyens Europeens mais les terroristes que vous nourrissez à nos frais! Les détenteurs d'armes légales — chasseurs, tireurs, collectionneurs — comptent sur leur représentation au Parlement européen pour ne pas devenir des victimes collatérales du terrorisme. Les détenteurs d'armes légales — chasseurs, tireurs, collectionneurs — comptent sur leur représentation au Parlement européen pour ne pas devenir des victimes collatérales du terrorisme et résister à l'influence excessive des personnels non élus de la Commission européenne.

Ils ont acheté légalement des armes qui représentent un capital financier important après un contrôle par tous les organismes de l'état. Ils ont contribué à maintenir des emplois. La législation actuelle sur les armes correspond à une loi juste et bien équilibrée. Ce n'est pas en modifiant la loi sur les armes des citoyens que les états pourront contrôler le marché des armes non déclarées entre les mains des voyous, des trafiquants, des terroristes, dont les acquisitions n'ont été contrôlées et enregistrées.

Les citoyens sont responsables de leurs armes et respectent la législation. L'accès aux armes rayées semi-automatiques est soumis en France à une réglementation draconienne autorisation préfectorale qui assure efficacement la sécurité. La proportion de crimes et délits impliquant des armes de cette nature légalement détenues est en effet infinitésimale.

Il est difficile de concevoir un régime légal plus restrictif encore pour ces armes, a moins de songer à en interdire purement et simplement l'acquisition et la détention. Cependant, comme une telle mesure ne frapperait que les titulaires d'une autorisation préfectorale en bonne et due forme, et donc des citoyens au dessus de tout soupçon, l'impact en matière de sécurité publique serait rigoureusement nul.

Il apparaît donc que le durcissement envisagé du régime légal des armes rayées semi-automatiques ne se justifie pas. La présente proposition semble d'avantage motivée par l'émotion suscitée par les tragiques événements récents additionnée de démagogie, que par l'approche impartiale et dépassionnée qui sied au bon gouvernement. Bonjour, Je comprends parfaitement les préoccupations de la Commission sur le trafic des armes illégales, pour lutter contre le terrorisme notamment. En revanche, en tant que pratiquant du tir sportif avec des armes semi-automatiques, je trouve particulièrement injuste de vouloir me priver de mes armes détenues légalement, alors même qu'il indiscutablement établit que les terroristes ou trafiquants d'armes ne s'approvisionnent jamais auprès des tireurs sportifs.

Je vous remercie donc de concentrer vos efforts sur les criminels et de ne pas déposséder les honnêtes citoyens, les premiers étant totalement distincts des seconds. La France vient d'être encore une fois victime de la barbarie. Certains sont visiblement tentés d'instrumentaliser ces dramatiques événements survenus ces derniers jours et de faire un énième amalgame douteux entre la détention légale d'armes semi-automatiques par des citoyens respectueux des lois et la détention illégale et l'utilisation par des terroristes contre des civils sans défense d'armes automatiques.

De cette proposition, il ressort une évidente contradiction entre le prétexte invoqué l'usage d'armes automatiques illégales et l'objectif réel la prohibition des armes semi-automatiques légales. Nous soutenons aussi la décision de nos responsables politiques de décréter l'état d'urgence, la situation l'imposait. Mais nous devons rester très vigilants quant aux résultats de cet état d'urgence. En effet, en plus de bafouer notre honneur, cela marquerait une grave atteinte aux libertés individuelles sans aucun impact positif sur la sécurité des citoyens et serait le signe d'une dérive que nous ne pourrions pas accepter sans réaction.

Je refuse l'amalgame qui est fait entre les détenteurs légaux et les terroristes! Les mesures en discussion actuellement visants un durcissement de la réglementation des armes détenues à titre légal est une erreur fondementale. En effet chaque tireur sportif est dûment referencé, et ses armes parfaitement enregistrées auprès des autorités locales.

Aucun terroristes ou autre criminel n'a accé à ces armes enregistrées et destiné au tir sportif. Les supprimer ne règlera en rien les trafics permettant aux criminels de s'équiper. La législation actuelle sur la détention et l'acquisition d'armes me parrait suffisante, en effet, la méthode actuelle permet de contrôler efficacement les armes détenues mais surtout les personnes détenant les armes.

Par ailleurs, les malheureux évenement survenus cette année à Paris mettent en cause des armes automatiques donc illégales en France et détenues illégalement par des personnes ayant de mauvaises intentions.

A mon sens, la priorité est donc le contrôle des armes détenues illégalement et non la répréhension des armes détenues légalement. Bonjour, Il s'agit d'une mesure injuste et absurde à l'encontre d'honnêtes citoyens dont les règles leurs imposent déjà des contraintes pour autant justifiées. L'objectif de lutter contre le terrorisme, si c'est bien l'objectif recherché, ne sera pas atteint. À l'heure actuelle où les citoyens ont du mal à faire confiance à la politique et à leurs représentants, interrogez vous plutôt sur votre rôle, votre fonctionnement et les attentes des citoyens.

Les conséquences de l'interdiction de détention d'armes semi-automatique sera préjudiciable aux tireurs et professionnels associés alors que la volonté actuelle va plutôt dans le sens de l'unité nationales, du patriotisme et de l'entre aide. Pour ma part, cette mesure remettra en question tous les investissements que j'ai réalisé dans cette passion et sera désastreuse tant sur le plan économique que moral. Mettre en place des mesures de contrôle et de limitation aurait été plus judicieux et approprié.

La législation est suffisante. Les terroristes ne passent pas pr les voies légales. Les armes des terroristes sont des armes de contrebande. L'amalgame entre les terroristes et les citoyens respectueux des lois est une erreur insupportable.

Les armes automatiques sont déjà interdites, les ceintures d'explosif aussi, cela ne gène en rien les terroristes. Disarming citizens, hunters and athletes will not affect evil doers from comminting terror attacks, it will only limit our own freedom to live the lives we want. Anyone supporting this bill is defacto i liason with the terrorists behind the Patis attacks, as this is the exact response they were hoping for. Also, banning firearms based upon their looks is completely unserious.

Would you ban cars because they look fast? Stop punishing law abiding citizens. Vote no to this proposal. Investigate illegal arms trafficking instead if you want to fight terrorism. VOUS ne ferez rien car vous en avez aucuns control. The thought that criminal use of firearms will decrease if lawfull ownership is made more difficult or impossible is wrong.

Criminals will, by definition, not care about laws! And so far, almost all of the weapons used by criminals are smuggled in to the EU, not stolen or used by lawfull owners.

La Législation Française sur la détention d'armes est réglementée je suis surpris de cette directive car les armes mises en causes sont tous des armes interdites sur notre territoire il faudrait renforcer les contrôles à nos frontières pour éviter cette proliférations de matériels en tous genres et ne pas faire des tireurs sportifs la cible innocente de ce texte. I am a licensed hunter and competitive pistol shooter. In Denmark it is possible to own firearms , like the ones you want to ban, if you have the right permits in order.

These permits takes a long time to get and is dependant on your criminal record and the general opinion of you based on your fellow shooters. Legal firearms are very seldom used for criminal activities.

But you are currently proposing a lawthat does nothing stop any illegal arms traffic and the terror it might cause. But instead makes life worse for those who are law biding citizens.

You cannot stop terrorism by restricting legal gun ownership. Put all effort on the trafficking of arms instead, since everyone in Europe knows where all the weapons that terrorists use come from. Please focus on stopping the easy access to illegal firearms within the EU, instead of depriving law abiding citizens of their semiautomatic firearms, used for hunting and sports shooting.

Bonjour Madame, Monsieur, A la lecture de cette proposition de loi, je suis choqué. Choqué de l'amalgame qui est fait entre tireurs sportifs et terroristes. Choqué de la récupération politique qui est faite de ces événements horribles qui touchent la France, et l'Europe, pour faire passer une loi pénalisant les tireurs sportifs et légaux. Choqué de la méconnaissance de certains députés européens quant aux législations nationales sur la détention des armes Choqué que l'on puisse croire lutter contre le marché noir et le trafic d'armes en restreignant les droits des tireurs sportifs qui acquièrent leurs armes dans le respect des lois et réglementations actuellement en vigueur.

Je compte sur vous pour avoir la clairvoyance sur ces événements et ne pas tout confondre, amalgamer un sport très intéressant et riche de valeurs humaines, et les actes inhumains qui nous venons de vivre. The proposed directive, will do nothing to inhibit terrorist and other criminals in acquiring firearms. It will only serve to punish legit firearms owners, sport shooters, and recreational shooters.

I propose that the directive gets rejected immediately. Taking firearms from law abiding, innocent citizens is disgraceful. I fail to see how this action is anything other than working with the terrorists. The terrorists work to take away our liberties and now so the EU parliament.

Why is the proposal to ban semi-automatic firearms from civilian possession made from a panel of a anti-gun individuals. This is not democracy, this is a dictatorship of the terrorist kind. Where is the representative to the EU Parliament from those that are actually educated in the facts with regard to sports target shooting and civilian gun ownership?

I am an Hunter and competetive shooter. How will banning my legal semi-auto rifles kept in gunsafe prevent terror? All terrorists use illegal full auto rifles from the black market. Disarming law obeyding citizens can't possiby change the outcome of an terroristattack done by extremists.

They will get the guns and explosives anyway. I will await a good argument from you on this topic. This proposal is only going to accomplish one thing and one thing only. It's going to make what the terrorists did a victory for them. The weapons used in these terrorist attacks were not civilian weapons, and it was not law abiding citizens that carried out that gruesome attack.

Hundreds of thousands of Europeans are enjoying the freedom to shoot with their semi automatic weapons, if you push this directive through you're removing our freedom and that's exactly what the terrorists wants. Public authority SE - The feedback is published in an anonymous way. The European Commission proposal would decrease the Swedish Armed Forces capability in shooting, considering the fact that many officers and soldiers are active as civilian shooters with semi automatic weapons.

I cittadini onesti, con legittime licenze di possesso di armi sono il primo baluardo di difesa contro terroristi ed altri criminali, le proposte folli di cui si parla in questi giorni, non farebbero altro che fare un regalo ai terroristi ed aumentare ulteriormente la diffidenza ed ostilità nei confronti delle istituzioni europee.

Civilian legal ownership is not a problem related to terrorism or other problems in a society. Weapons laws and licencing should be a national matter. By accepting this proposal, a lot of hunters and sportshooters will be restricted in a way, that cannot be justified by facts. Legit weapon owners are not to blame for the weapons used by criminal activities. Those weapons are bought on the black market, and that problem will not be solved, by restricting the ordinary law abiding citizen in its sports.

Please consider that restricting our rights as citizens will not resolve the issue with illegal arms. Terrorists and criminals do not bother to register their weapons, they will always be able to acquire illegal guns. Your proposition will not have any effect what so ever on the illegal guns circulating in the EU! Please take measures to fight illegal guns not the legal guns!

Sicerely yours, Pia Clerté A compeitive shooter. Do not criminalize legal sporting guns, example semi-automatic guns, please. Criminalizing used machine is not the solution, lets focus on the reason and try to prevent reasons that mass-murder does not hapen. The proposed amendment to the EU Gun Directive contains unconstitutional and immoral parts, mainly the categorical banning of legally owned firearm types.

Terrorists use guns that are already illegal. Moreover, banning of, say, semi-automatic rifles that resemble service rifles would ruin Finnish defence doctrine that relies on active reservists. It would ruin our motivation and our accumulated skillset. Go after illegal guns, go after criminals, go after terrorists, but do it right.

Harmonizing the deactivation standards is a big step, I congratulate the proposal for that - but it's among the only sane things in the paper. I've read about the legislation and I don't understand why good citizens cannot have semi auto guns.

We are good people who are obeying the law and of nonharm to the society. It seemes very wrong to strip us from theese benefits when terrorists strike society. They dont use guns, they use illegaly smuggled weapons from Balkan or outside eu!

We are not to be blamed. This will continue until we have proper border controls. Removing the guns from law abiding citizens in eu, will only make things worse, many law enforcing officers and military personel train their shooting skills and develop within theese sports.

We love our sports so mch and would not risk it, so we are very much law abiding citizens to be able to keep our sports. It strikes very wrong when honsest good people are punished like this for no reason. Look at all statistics and you will see that legal guns are not a problem.

Also look into theese countries which have already made what has been proposed here, and you will see that it has no effect! Its just us who will be the ones who loses unfortunately.

Im Swedish and we have strict rules for semi auto rifles. It takes 2 years and quite some skills to be able to aply for licence. And I think it shall take time and be hard to get licence, it's not for everyone to have, it should be regulated hard by the authorities as in sweden now!

I dislike it beeing to easy to get a semi automatic rifle. That should be same all within EU. Please consider this text, a well functioning society is a society where law abiding people can earn trust to be able to have shooting as a hobby. A society where citizens are not being able to earn trust is a society which has to much in common with our neighbourghs in the east. Au matin du 7 janvier , des terroristes attaquaient Charlie Hebdo avec des armes automatiques, illégales et non déclarées.

Depuis cette date, l'Europe prépare une nouvelle législation pour interdire les armes à feu semi-automatiques aux citoyens respectueux des lois, bien que ce type d'armes ne soit jamais utilisé par des terroristes ou par le grand banditisme. Ces derniers préfèrent utiliser des Kalashnikovs automatiques intraçables provenant des trafics d'armes.

La nouvelle législation est dans les tuyaux depuis avril , mais c'est maintenant, le 18 novembre , à peine 5 jours après les derniers attentats à Paris, qu'elle sort. Les victimes de cette tragédie n'ont même pas encore été enterrés, les criminels pas encore tous arrêtés, l'enquête toujours en cours, que déjà, l'Europe annonce des mesures pour éviter qu'une nouvelle tragédie recommence.

Malheureusement, rien dans ces mesures n'auraient pu éviter ces attentats, puisque aucun d'eux n'ont été perpétrés avec les armes actuellement légales qui sont visées par cette directive. Ce n'est pas logique, et c'est surtout extrêmement injuste. C'est injuste pour les victimes, c'est injuste pour les citoyens respectueux des lois qui perdent leurs propriété et leur passe-temps.

Dites NON à la proposition de loi annoncée le 18 novembre N'interdisez pas les armes semi-automatiques sous le prétexte qu'elles "ressemblent aux armes automatiques".

Nous, les citoyens demandons que l'Europe se concentre sur les vrais problèmes: Voilà la situation actuelle, et cette nouvelle législation ne fait RIEN pour traiter ces problèmes. S'attaquer aussi aux ventes via internet, c'est privé les citoyens d'une capcité de choix et mise en concurrence, en effet le nombre d'armurier en france étant faible et décroissant, supprimer le support d'internet ne ferait que créer des situation de monopole avec les dérives tarifaires qui peuvent en découller.

Le armi le devono togliere ai terroristi e ai delinquenti e non agli onesti cittadini!!! Bonjour , ne faites pas l'erreur de l'Angleterre des années 90, ne vous trompez de cibles ce n'est pas en supprimant les armes officiels legalement détenues pour le tir sportif ,la chasse, et les collectionneurs honête,que vous allez régler le problème des armes illégales. Ce sont ces cibles qu'il faut traquer. La commissione potrebbe quindi istituire una licenza unica europea, ovvero stabilire dei criteri uniformi ed oggettivi a cui gli Stati membri devono adeguarsi per il rilascio delle licenze di porto d'armi, uniformando anche i requisiti personali e le modalità di controllo.

Ritengo del tutto inutili queste restrizioni perchè i criminali non acquistano le armi in armeria quindi tali manovre avrebbero effetti negativi solo sugli onesti cittadini a cui verrbbero sottratti beni del valore di migliaia di euro, sulle migliaia di imprese che lavorano in questo settore e su tutte le associazioni sportive che andrebbero ad estinguersi. Cette proposition est une honte. Sous couvert de lutte contre le terrorisme vous voulez priver les tireurs sportifs de leur loisir.

Vous savez très bien que les terroristes ou délinquants n'utilisent pas d'arme légale, donc renforcer des mesures déjà drastique exemple: Sachez que si cette proposition passe je n'hésiterais plus à voter pour les parties les plus anti-UE qu'il y a et que je militerais dorénavant contre cette dictature européenne qui nous privent de nos droits fondamentaux.

I strongly oppose the suggested legislation. It has absolutely no effect on illegal guns trade but destroys completely the basis for Finnish reservists possibilities for shooting practise. If implemented, this will have a huge effect on EU popularity in Finland.

I'm very concerned about the fact that this will destroy many sporting activities and also a finnish army reservist sport's that is crucial for the shooting skills of the finnish army reserve. Amongst the fact that this is based on totally flawed information i hope you revise the data that was collected by Fabio Marini and actually ask for real data from the governaments instead of an institute that has no relation to governaments or actual data.

Im also wondering why are you punishing the Most law abiding bunch of all, if you break the law and you have gun licenses they are revoked I. E Get into a fight in a bar so basicly your punishing Millions of law abiding citizen for the sake of populism? The current proposal is done in great haste after several heinous acts of terrorism within the European Union. However, there is no direct link between legally owned firearms, i.

Limiting the possibilities to own and use certain types of firearms will not put an end to terrorism or gun related crimes, it will mearly limit the citizens of the European Union to engage in sports and recreational activities. The focus in the aftermath of the Paris attacks should be put on unravelling illegal gun trafficking, as this is the major source of illegal firearms.

That being said, there are some good initiatives in the proposal, e. I do hope that the proposal is not implemented in its current form, as it will support the extremists acts by limiting the rights and possibilities of law abiding citizens of the European Union. I strongly believe that we should switch focus from citizen to states weapon market, if we want to stop the flow.

Moreover, just as EU is sponsoring and encouraging the spread such as the bls-d among citizen, so should be empowered the safety education which includes the possibility of react when in life-threating danger. Let us be hard targets, not cans in a carousel.

Thank you Andrea Bray. I strongly oppose the proposal to change the way law abiding citizens are allowed to own weapons. I am an active hunter and sport shooter and I use semi automatic weapons in both disciplines.

The terrible deeds that were done in France has nothing to do with legal firearms and to ban legal ownership of these weapons will do absolutely nothing to prevent future terrorist acts! The only thing that will happen is that you punish regular people instead of the terrorists! Furthermore the proposal itself is hastily put together and filled with incorrect "facts".

I suggest it is thrown in the waste basket and a thorough and impartial investigation is put into placebtondetermjne how the EU can stop the flow of illegal weapons within its borders instead. That is where the real problem lies! Les citoyens Européens apprécieront eux mêmes la justesse de ces propositions. This act is neither proportionate nor does it have any valid purpose in the aspect to protect EU- citizens. The terrible terror-crimes committed in Paris recently should not be used by politicians to infringe your citizens rights.

They did not use any legal fire arms. The British comedy act where they discuss politicians logic come to mind in this aspect. Therefore we must ban all cats! The last 10 years here in Sweden only two 2! The influx of illegal firearms and the ease with which these weapons switch hands is the real problem. Don't just try to fool our citizens into thinking they are safe by taking the easy way with the only benefit of making the leadership look like they are taking action. Use the means we provide you to justified ends, not just to forbid the incredibly law abiding citizens who,shoot, hunt and compete of doing what they love.

These weapons may look scary and dangerous but most of them shoot the same rounds as the bolt action rifles most commonly used before. If the millions of people who own guns in the EU wanted to hurt one another they would have done so already, and will be able to do so with illegal firearms or other weapons.

You see It's the mad men and terrorist that are the danger here, not the weapon in it self. And certainly not the weapons way of chambering another round. And the citizens trust in it. Please don't alienate the millions of gunowners in the EU with these laws. Vote no to banning semi-automatic rifles!

Non ritengo opportuno introdurre nuove misure restrittive per le armi da fuoco acquistabili e detenibili dai privati cittadini. Le norme in vigore in Italia sono già sufficienti. Inoltre è fatto notorio che terroristi e delinquenti si procurano le armi - sempre più spesso di origine militare, quindi interdette ai comuni cittadini - sul mercato illegale.

Ricordiamo tutti le parole dell'illuminista Cesare Beccaria, il quale nel suo testo "Dei delitti e delle pene" raccomandava appunto di non disarmare i cittadini onesti, proprio per non metterli alla mercè di qualunque malintenzionato. Firearms Directive New directive is based definently on wrong approach to fight terrorism. Attacks in Paris had nothing to do with legal ownership of firearms.

Terrorist and criminals do not care about laws. The directive suggests that law abiding citizens are criminals and are not qualified to own firearms. Banning firearms based on the looks is just plain stupid. EC wants to disarm it's citizens and for what?? Making us even easier targets for criminals. Banning guns means the end of legimate, very controlled and very very SAFE shooting sports. I seriously hope that common sence will prevail.

Does EU think that law abiding citizens are a threat to public safety? Right now the reasoning can only be in green leftwing and their phobia about firearms which are not based in anything else exept lies. I strongly oppose further restriction on law abiding citizens right to own firearms. Criminals will not send in their semi automatic firearms just because you restrict the law abiding citizens to own them!

Je suis certain que ces personnes n'ont absolument rien en commun mêe pas leurs armes et explosifs Thank you for possibility to give feedback.

I am very concerned related to objectivity of the task force which prepared the proposal. Person who is in charge, explained to plenty of people that nothing has been done at the end of October, saying there will be formal hearing arranged later. In reality, they were preparing the semi-auto ban behind curtain just waiting an opportunity to push it through without prober handling of the proposal.

They have NOT contacted with associations who have knowledge about hunting, sport-shooting - just associations which want to ban firearms from law-abiding citizens. Also, the proposal is not such that it is clear.

Current proposal is not clearly defining what is the so called banned firearm and what is not. Intention is clearly to ban everything with this vague terminology. Such a poor preparation of directive must never be accepted - it will just cause more problem than what is intended to solve. I add one more issue that I need to highlight. I have put my own money upto It is not okay to me that there is threath that all will be collected away without compensation.

Such stealing is not in anyway acceptable. This is last bit of trust towards EU if this will pass as proposed. There are almous These people start demanding resignation from EU without prober handling of this proposal.

Just as curiosity - We have heard that there is only two weeks period related to this directive update - so why this is open until to mid January ? I will add my feedback later - this as a first comment to you to review, best regards. While I agree on the main subject of the proposal, making it harder for criminals to get hold of weapons, I think there are several problems with it: The timing of the proposal seems to be abuse of the current situation, and not a democratic process.

After the recent events no politician will vote no to anything that limits weapons. The timing of this proposal suggests that the people behind it want to utilize this fact. I want EU proposals to decided upon by a democratic process, not by fear, or what ever is popular in current media.

The proposal is written in a very inprecise manner. One almost thinks that it was written by someone who does not know anything about weapons.

For example banning semi-automatic weapons would mean the end of many shooting sports. While semi-automatic might sound bad to someone who does not know about weapons, basically all firearms are semi-automatic. The proposal also uses the inprecise wording that "military looking weapons" should be banned. But how will this be determined? To me all rifles look the same, and all pistols look the same.

Does this mean that all rifles and pistols should be banned? The proposal will probably have no effect on what it is trying to achive. Criminals almost never use weapons stolen from law abiding citizens. They simply have much better and easier options on the black market, where real military weapons, leftovers from wars, are readily available.

The proposal also suggests things that does not make sense So the only people affected by this would be law abiding citizens. Please review the proposal, and clear up what it is actually trying to achive and back it up by logic, and statistics. Focus on fixing the problems with reactivated weapons, instead of trying to stop all shooting sports and hunting in Europe. Io come si evince anche nella mia Page Porto d'Armi Libero Ma Responsabile sono per la difesa amministrata personalmente dai cittadini laddove lo stato non ne è capace e sostengo che se si hanno i requisiti per lo sportivo lo si hanno anche per il personale è che il diritto alla vita sia un diritto acquisito ed imprescindibile e non una concessione dello stato.

I think you should reconsider to go through and make a law that makes a lot of law abiding gun owners to stop With there hobby of shooting. There is in no way so that this law will decrease the illegal weapons to Flood into Europe. You should focus on the illegal weapons and the criminals that uses them instead of punising they who are law abiding. Think twice and start with the real problem, criminals with illegal weapons. I am appalled how the EC is using the Terror attack in Paris, to crack down on legal gun owners.

We did not commit these acts, so why are we the ones being targeted??? Simply banning what we own, what we bought with hard earned money means it becomes worthless the second this law is adopted. How would you like it if your investment became worthless over night??? Give us more rights to have and carry weapons, do not take them out from our houses.

Most of us are sheep but also many are sheepdog and surely could prevent terrorist attack if carting weapons. You are on the wrong way. Terrorists do not use legal or stolen weapons; they just buy them on the black market. The directive proposal seems to be unnecessary and even outright harmful. Common standards for deactivating firearms is the only part of the proposal I can fully agree with.

Other parts, such as banning class A weapons, legally only held by strictly controlled gun collectors, and which have never been used in crime in Finland I can't say for other EU countries , for example, would destroy large amount of private property and historically valuable objects in Europe. Even worse is banning of B7 class semi-automatic firearms, which would greatly harm sport shooters and in Finland's case, reservists, who use such weapons for practicing.

Unless I'm mistaken, the proposal suggests confiscating these weapons without full compensation, which is even against Finnish constitution. On the other hand, there could be some merit for having some standards how to convert ex-military full auto weapons to semiautomatics, so that they aren't too easy to convert back to full auto. Also, the five year maximum duration for licences with mandatory health checks when renewing licence would create unnecessary bureaucracy and expenses for gun owners.

I cittadini europei detentori di armi son persone rispettose della legge. Dear Europe make more strictly law or banning semiautomatic B7 is not the solution People have ears and eyes to hear and see where a uniform can't get! We operate in close protection, and in our small teams use intelligence listening, dogs, and teams that Ghost can move the territory without attracting attention!!

Unarmed citizen is a citizen dead. Hi, This proposal has no effect to real problem, which is illegal weapons. This only quits sport shooting in Europe, legal firearm owners are law abiding citizens and punishing them has no basis at all. Also this proposal has too loose definitions, what is actually "firearm which resembles something"? I am worried that these kind of proposals are done in great secrecy, it doesn't give very good image about European Commission. This proposal should be withdrawn automatically.

Please stop the proposed ban on semi-auto guns! Please use facts in law-making! Dont be a law-factory. I among otters enjoy recreational shooting both in competition and informal competitions. I have kids too and practice safe gun handling - even with toy guns. Don't be a signal law factory - there's enough of that and the laws are strict enough - punish those who violate instead of taking every responsible gun owner hostage Ancora una volta state penalizzando noi onesti cittadini europei detentori di armi legalmente detenute,con leggi sempre più restrittive a danno di noi cittadini paragonandoci ai peggiori criminali e terroristi che acquistano armi illegali dal mercato nero.

Questa non è la nostra europa,non è l'Europa che ci rappresenta,un europa che ci priva delle nostre passionie che ci toglie il diritto alla difesa. Ricordiamoci che siamo in una europa democratica e che la dittatura è deceduta da anni. I find the proposal for EU-wide regulations for marking of guns.

I oppose the criminalization of legal semi-auto weapons, used for sport shooting by civilian owners. We got our sports guns in legal way with all permissions and pay for them.

Our guns are under control, by guns register in our own countries, and all owners were checked if we are able to have guns and use it for sport.

I think that prohibited for legal owners will not solve the terorist problems and threat! I am not responsible for your "multicultural" experiment gone wrong So no, you are not getting any of my belongings with significant value attached to them without a fight. I think EU parliament is not "legit" authority to even try to do so. Fuck you and your "very important paper piling worthless non essential EU shit". Your opinion or point of view's are not needed nor wanted here in finland.

I strongly disagree with the proposed ban for semiautomatic rifles, because the licensed law abiding gun owners are not the threat. Instead most of them are army reservists especially in Finland and are practising with their own guns and at their own cost to be able to defend Finland.

The proposed directive does not provide any solution against terrorism, but in stead is is very harmful for national security. The proposed ban would do a lot harm to sport shooting too practical shooting. I am gun owner, active army reservist, sport shooter, training instructor for several decades now. Reclassifying self-loading semi-automatic firearms under Category A of the Firearms Directive, and banning their possession by private individuals, will cause serious harm to the Finnish national interest.

I strongly believe that the directive should not be opened for inspection purposes. A prohibition on the possession of self-loading firearms by private individuals would have a detrimental effect on the activities of voluntary reservists and this would have a negative impact on national defence capability. The Finnish defence model relies on a large standing reserve coupled with voluntary defence training, a significant part of which comprises the continued training and practice of shooting skills.

Stricter directives that prohibit the civilian ownership of self-loading firearms would have a destablishing effect on these essential voluntary defence-related activities. In addition to the disruptive effect on defence capability, a ban on the possession of self-loading firearms by private individuals would significantly impede other hunting and target shooting related activities including the Olympics.

Sports shooting, particularly practical pistol shooting e. Finland should also continue efforts to ensure the rights of registered firearms collectors to continue their hobby in the future. I agrees with the content of the reference document memorandum with regard to online commerce and distance selling.

The trading sector should not be set categorizing obstacles, however trade in firearms must take place within a framework of rules to prevent illegal trafficking.

More over It is my opinion, that the memorandum presented does not define clear and concise reasons for the alleged pressure to change current laws in order to prohibit the possession of these firearms and their online sales. Finland should obtain a more specific explanation from the European Union institutions regarding this matter. I share the widespread shock following the recent horrific terrorist attacks that took place in France.

However these recent events cannot exclusively lead to changes in the regulations for all member states of the European Union. I strongly oppose any measures which would unjustly punish law-abiding and responsible firearms holders, by restricting or withdrawing their rights to practice their hobby.

The European Union and its member states should instead work together and focus their efforts to combat illicit arms trafficking and illegal possession of firearms. Banning registered collectors from possessing fully automatic firearms, or registered practical shooters and reservist shooters from possessing self-loading firearms that resemble military weapons, carries the risk that such firearms are erroneously reported lost or stolen, and end up on the illicit market.

Any amendment to the Directive has the potential to result in the expropriation of privately-held firearms. Expropriation of private property should result in current owners being fully compensated. The redemption cost has been estimated to run in to hundreds of millions of Euros. The allocation of a similar sized financial resource towards public safety, and the pan-European fight against illicit arms trafficking by the police, border guard and customer operations, would achieve a much greater effect.

I will also note that: Firearms classification according to the directives: Firearm safety is not created by the technical classification of different firearms; Firearms safety is achieved through legislature and executive law which focuses on the user and the demand for legitimate purpose. Magazine capacity of firearms: Categorical restriction of magazine capacity is not the solution to increased firearms safety. The technical properties of a firearm must be assessed and aligned with the requirements of the legitimate purpose for which it will be used, not by theoretical fire power rate of fire, magazine capacity, range, impact effect.

A ban on self-loading firearms is very problematic for competitive sports shooters and it does not improve firearm safety.

Replacement of self-loading firearms, to the extent that replacement is possible, with pump action or bolt-action firearms, would bring unbearable costs for gun owners and would result in pointless and costly bureaucratic work for licensing authorities.

Biometric identification smart gun technology: The development of smart technologies to improve firearm safety is not yet mature enough to be taken in to widespread use. The possibility of smart technologies for retrofitting to old firearms is not self evident and would presumably also bring very significant costs.

Deactivating firearms should not, in principle, be denied, however technical implementation-, acceptance-, supervision- and safety labelling requirements for deactivation should be clearly defined.

Aesthetic values should be taken in to consideration during technical implementation. The right of firearms possession: The current directive should be extended to cover all firearms, so that they are at least part of the notification procedure. National legislation instructions are good enough, at least in Finland, for the evaluation of the suitability of individuals to hold a firearm permit.

Assessing the preconditions for permit possession does not need clarification in Finland, but licensing authorities throughout Europe should have common practices. Internet sales or restriction of mail order sales: No marketing method should be categorically denied, however the arms and ammunition trade shall be subject to clear requirements for implementing the sale, identification of the buyer, as well as transport and delivery of the firearm.

Close to Finnish citizens hole a firearm possession permit and there are around 1,6 million legally-held firearms in Finland. Bonjour, Etant tireur sportif je ne peux que m'indigner que pour soit disant lutter contre le trafic d'armes vous vous en preniez aux tireurs sportifs.

Les hors la loi sont, par définition, hors la loi I wholeheartedly dismiss this misguided, malicious and purposefully condemning amendment to the firearms directive. The EU officials who prepared this draft purposely concealed their intentions and content of the document, in the most undemocratic way possible trying to penalize innocent people for the acts of terrorism. Any rational person understands that the banning of guns from legal, licensed owners has NOTHING to do with terrorists and criminals illegally obtaining fully automatic assault rifles, which are already illegal to begin with.

I do not support this directive and it should be completely re-written with consultation from european shooters associations and governments, as a democracy should work to begin with! Is agoinst law, human rights, security and specially not effective against terrorist with illegal guns! Madame, Monsieur, Je m'adresse à vous par la présente car l'heure est grave. En effet, mon pays, ma nation, ma culture est menacée, attaquée, blessée même depuis quelques années déjà mais de manière plus tragique encore cette année Des criminels, aguerris et connus, pour la plupart des différents services de police, justice, et comble de l'horreur des services antiterroriste, se sont équipés d'armes de manière totalement illégale via le traffic organisé et le marché noir pour commettre les pires attentats que la France n'est jamais connu.

A l'heure ou je vous écris plus de innocents attendent leurs obsèques, plus de blessés soignent leurs blessures, et je ne serai vous dire combien de familles sont endeuillées par cette tragédie qui quelque part nous a tous touché.

Les victimes ont été la cible de fanatiques religieux qui connaissent bien les ficelles des marchés parallèles, tant pour les faux documents que pour leurs armes, outils indispensables à leur tuerie de masse. Il est légitime de souhaiter juguler ces trafics, il en va de la sécurité de tous. Il est de votre devoir en tant que représentant du peuple d'y parvenir.

Mais je vous en prie ne vous trompez pas de cible, d'objectif, ni d'orientation. En effet, je suis tireur sportif, pas de très grand niveau mais je pratique ce sport d'adresse et concentration dans un cadre convivial, récréatif, de manière assidue et surtout dans le respect de la lois.

Pour assouvir cette passion de manière plus personnelle, j'ai souhaité faire l'achat de mon propre équipement. Quoi de plus naturel me direz-vous, celui qui pratique le tennis a bien sa raquette, le cycliste son vélo, le golfeur ses clubs, donc le tireurs ses armes.

Mais ne fait pas l'acquisition de ce matériel qui veut, et fort heureusement tout est déjà très bien encadré. Les armes sont des outils,des objets, comme un arc, un camion, un couteau, un skateboard. Ils nous permettent d'effectuer des tâches avec, toutefois un apprentissage est indispensable pour chacun d'eux sous peines de se blesser ou de blesser par méconnaissance donc, du bon fonctionnement et des règles de sécurité.

La fédération française de tir par l'intermédiaire du processus du carnet de tir ainsi que de l'avis favorable établi par les présidents de clubs, indispensable pour tout achat d'armes de catégorie B, atteste que le prétendant à l'achat connaît et maîtrise les règles de sécurité liées à sa pratique assidue de la discipline.

Puis le prétendant dépose un dossier auprès de sa préfecture, ce qui génère une enquête effectuée par les forces de l'ordre visant à vérifier sa non dangerosité, et sa capacité à détenir ce type de matériel. Ces enquêtes durent quelques semaines voir quelques mois, permettant de recueillir énormément d'informations sur le prétendant.

Ainsi un lien, une traçabilité est faite entre l'administration et le citoyen responsable qui détient légalement des armes. Si je vous écris cette lettre c'est qu'aujourd'hui mon sport, ma passion, mon hobby est danger. Sous couvert de la lutte contre le traffic d'arme, vous allez pénaliser des millions d'honnêtes citoyens européens détenteurs légaux d'armes à feu si vous interdisiez la détention d'armes longues semi automatique sous prétexte qu'elles aient l'apparence d'armes de guerre. Vous n'êtes pas sans savoir que les organisations criminelles et terroristes ne respectent ni la procédure décrite ci dessus ni l'achat de leurs armes en armurerie.

En plus de l'effet négatif au près des détenteurs légaux d'armes qui se sentiraient assimilés à ces criminelles, vous mettriez en danger de nombreux emplois liés à ce secteur d'activité partout en Europe. En conséquence de quoi une nouvelle incompréhension ne manquerait pas de creuser d'avantage le fossé entre les peuples européens et leurs dirigeants, stigmatisant ainsi l'honnêteté de celui qui suit la règle.

Imaginez seulement une seconde que les appels de DAESH à utiliser des voitures pour nous écraser soient entendu et perpétré par leurs complices sur notre territoire, la Commission Européenne irait-elle jusqu'à interdire la détention et l'utilisation de nos véhicules?

Par conséquent je vous prie de faire valoir notre droit de détenir légalement des armes. Car ce type de lois n'est pas sans rappeler la réquisition effectuée en à la veille des heures les plus sombres de notre histoire contemporaine, ce qui ne manquera pas de faire écho en ce sens au près de l'ensemble des concitoyens et aurait selon moi comme effet l'inverse de celui recherché.

Vous remerciant de m'avoir lu jusque-là. En espérant que vous prendrez la bonne décision. This regulation is nonsense! Control the travellers at the inner european borders, put more police in the streets. A sportsshooter, who has legally aquired a semi-automatic weapons is never involved in a terror act!

Take care of what really matter, get the same laws on weapons as in Germany everywhere, and stop this bullshit! I find the proposal for EU-wide regulations for marking of guns and gun parts sound, but I oppose the criminalization of semi-auto weapons, merely because they look a certain way.

Pleas stop punishing law abiding citizens as shootists, hunters or collectors for the results of mismanaged foreign, domestic and economic policy. The guns used in terror attacks as in Paris were illegal anyway and no law in the world will make criminals think it over or stop them anyway. Instead it might be a better idea to remove the causes for this terror instead of fighting windmills or symptoms.

It's good that EU is trying to prevent more terrorist attacks. That can't be bought in Europe. You have done nothing to prevent a new terrorist attack. You will destroy many years of hunting tradition, destroy many companies not just weapons and ammunition manufacturers, but gun smith's, sporting stores, travel companies and much more It's sad to see this Make laws that works, not that looks good.

What this law is saying is 'because you own or want to buy an semi automatic rifle, you are a terrorist' that's like saying that because you are form an Arabic country and you are a Muslim, you are a terrorist. Those horrible acts of violence in France was committed illegal military weapons. Banning legal firearms is not solution to stop terrorists. Sono un cittadino onesto possessore di armi,la proposta di limitazioni ed inasprimento della direttiva è sbagliata.

E' necessario combattere il commercio illegale non vessare i cittadini onesti con assurde limitazioni. Hello, I as a sportshooter find it completly stupid to punish us, the legal gun owners and them that want to become one for the horrible things that terrorists do.

The only way to change something ist to change the social politiks not the gun laws. This Directive will have no impact on the terrorist trade in weapons and will have s massive impact on law abiding citizens.

It includes subjective terminology and impedes those legal businesses and their customers performing perfectly legal transactions. This proposal appears to have been written by someone with little knowledge of the topic and a chip on their shoulder. Hello, My name is Björn Svensson and I am Sport shooter that compete in both pistol and rifle competitions. The new suggested changes of the firearms legislation will destroy My complete sport career.

I am a lawabiding citizen and think that Europé skall stop all possibilities for criminals and terrorists fr. Geting their hands on Guns for illegal It is My true belive that this is not Done via your suggestion.

The entry costs 10 euros. Elegant and fashionable Club that offers commercial music and Spanish. The place is frequented by Catalans. Inside there are two large dance floors. Great place if you love techno music, an obsession in Barcelona. Diagonal, , Barcelona Open from Thursday to Saturday from The Bikini is a club with live music from the best of Barcelona. When the groups have finished playing, the space transforms into a nightclub where you can dance until the morning.

The Interior is spacious and divided into two rooms, which sometimes are turned into a single large room, Thanks to the use of mobile partition walls. The average age ranges from 25 to 35 years and is elegant attire required.

Small club with live music and Latin American music. The entry costs euro and dress code is treated. South American Club, with few tourists.

Latin American music, mainly bachata and salsa. The Macarena is a small but crowded disco, situated in the Centre of Barcelona, a short walk from La Rambla.

Here you will find minimal music, House and techno, played by the best international djs. The Marula Café is a disco with funk music, soul and Latin. Located in the heart of Barcelona, the place is the massive presence of tourists and sees an audience of older. There's a central dance floor with two bars. Good music selection gives the club an upbeat and friendly.

The Sidecar is a small disco , located just off La Rambla and open daily. Inside you can find a dance floor, a bar and an area with stage. The music is varied and depends on the evening: The small basement attracts a young audience formed by locals and tourists, many of them come from the hostels located around Plaza Reial.

Located in the heart of the old town, the Harlem Jazz Club is one of the the most famous jazz clubs in Barcelona and offers jazz music, Funk and soul every night, before with live concerts and later, later in the evening, with international djs music for dancing until dawn.

The Club consists of a room with a bar and a dance floor at the back. The Harlem Jazz Club is a warm and inviting place with Dim lighting, cheap cocktails, but above all a warm.

The club is frequented by a mature audience and demanding. The club can get up to people and is very popular with locals and among many young tourists who come to Barcelona to immerse himself in his nightlife. Situated on the beach of Barceloneta, the Club CDLC is a restaurant after dinner turns into a nightclub that hosts world famous djs.

The club has a restaurant area overlooking the sea and a lounge area with comfortable chairs and sofas. The music ranges from RnB, to House up to electronic music and techno. The CDLC is one of the most exclusive clubs in Barcelona It attracts an international audience, young and hip, especially football players, rich tourists and yacht owners.

The kitchen is very respectable: The dishes prepared by our chef Alfonso Aranda blend the best of Oriental cuisine with Mediterranean tradition.

Great place to live in the elegant and exclusive nightlife of Barcelona. One of the biggest clubs located around the beach of Barceloneta , the Catwalk is a disco that spans two floors.

Downstairs there is a large dance floor and a bar with seating, While upstairs there is a chill-out area where you can relax and chat. The club offers mainly House music and various genres like funky, handbag and vocal. The Catwalk is one of the the most famous nightclubs in Barcelona and often hosts international djs, including Eric Morillo, Roger Sanchez and The Unabombers.

The audience is international and fashionable: The Input former club The One is a large nightclub located at Poble Espanyol , which offers mostly techno music, minimal, House or electro.

People come here to dance till dawn. Alternative rock music club and concerts of experimental bands. Disco located in Carrer de Numancia , attended by Catalans and tourists. Disco where you can dance to the music of Latin America, like salsa, merengue and pachanga. Great place if you want to avoid the crowded tourist nightclubs on the beach. Frequented mainly by locals. Disco located near de La Rambla. Open from , Les Enfants Club is one of the oldest clubs in the scene of Barcelona nightlife.

The club is centrally located, near La Rambla. Inside there are two dance floors: Club composed of two environments: On the dancefloor to dance to the beat of techno and House music, While the cocktail bar offers softer tones and more funky, with local djs. The KER is dedicated to lovers of electronic music and aims to recreate the warm and friendly atmosphere that has defined the culture of the club in the years ' 70 and ' The Mac Arena Mar is a beach club in Ibiza style, situated on the sea front, offering electro-House music.

The place is famous for the events of Sunday. In addition to, There is free admission all night. During the day, the Mac Arena It's also a great place to eat by the sea, with a tasty menu and a great wine list. Here you can find innovative cuisine, succulent delicious cocktails to SIP during the afternoon on the terraces along the pier. The cocktail bar upstairs serves Teppanyaki grilled with mojitos expertly prepared.

Sophisticated place geared to pre-clubbing. Huge pub located a short distance from the Razzmatazz where can you buy cheap sangria and beer! Inside there are large tables, a billiard room and a concert hall. The pub is packed with people every night, and is frequented by locals and tourists alike. Here you can dance and meet other people without difficulty! Be careful because there are two Oveja Negra , one located at Carrer Sitges 5, small and nothing that, While the second, located near the Razzmatazz at carrer de Zamora 78, is the best!

Former confectionery modernist style and frequented mainly by artists and intellectuals. La Bolsa is an original pub, whose peculiarities are the prices of drinks that, as in the stock market, increase and decrease depending on demand.

The place is still cheap and is frequented mainly by Catalans. Quiet pub with great atmosphere: Pubs offering shots of alcohol in 1,80 euro and a liter of cocktails only 10 euros. Although the place is small, It is still very popular and is perfect to enjoy a pre-fun night. Situated on the seafront between the clubs Shôko and Sotavento, the Barcelona attractions is, as the name suggests, a bar with interiors covered with ice and the constant temperature of -5 degrees! To enter you have to pay 15 euro and have included a jacket, a pair of gloves and a drink.

This place is for you if you want to proovare the experience of drinking your cocktail while sitting on chairs made of ice. The Miramelindo is one of the busiest and largest among the bars located on Passeig del Born , and is characterized by large wooden beams supporting the ceiling. The place is very busy on weekends, When hordes of locals descend to party and enjoy the homemade cocktails at low price.

Located in the Raval area, in what was once the Chinese quarter, the Bar Pastis is one of the historic bars of Barcelona. The place is very small and hosts live concerts ranging from Brazilian music, that argentina and French. Once you have ordered your drink you can relax on one of the leather chairs and watch the world go by on the Rambla, legendary artery of the city. The soundtrack ranges from French pop, to jazz and is designed to provide moments of relaxation.

Despite its prime location at the top of the legendary La Rambla, It's actually surprisingly easy to walk past the Boadas without noticing its distinctive red doors, which at least saved him from being packed with tourists in shorts and sandals. Actually, This modest cocktail lounge is open from , which makes it the oldest cocktail bar in Spain. The bar was founded by the eponymous Miguel Boadas , who first learned the art of cocktails at the bar The Floridita of Havana Cuba at that time was known as Ibiza to present day.

And like in the years ' 30, even today the bartenders of Boadas shake and mix classic drinks from behind the counter, dressed in Tuxedo and bow ties. Consisting of huge space just off Plaza Catalunya , the Belushi is a modern and airy bar, London-style more than a typical Catalan pub. By day the place is frequented by young people while taking a break from shopping to enjoy fresh drinks on comfy couches tobacco color, or take a coffee on the terrace.

In the evening there is live music and live sports. The nearby Youth Hostel gathers a large clientele that comes to Belushi to SIP the pitchers of sangria at less than 10 euro and take advantage of special offers on beers. This is also a great place to party in the midst of an international crowd. A wide range of beers 13 on tap, In addition to other varieties in bottles is completed by a menu of delicious home cooked meals, grilled chicken with creamy sauce to Irish whiskey, their famous Irish breakfast and the Sunday roast.

As you would expect from any self-respecting Irish pub, There is plenty of sporting events broadcast live, including football, ice hockey and rugby. Very popular is also their hilarious weekly tournament Beer Pong , held every Thursday from The Flaherty continuously hosts parties and live music events and promotions on drinks.

The main theme of Cat Bar are, as the name suggests, cats: A watch with the face of a huge cat is hanging on a wall, While cheap plastic felines from China shake their legs in front of you, and all around are placed various photos and memorabilia depicting always cats that embellish the rest of the bar. The Cat Bar is also the only vegan restaurant in Barcelona , and the menu includes delicious tortillas and vegan quiche secret recipe! It is also possible to order four different types of craft beer.

One of the most sophisticated cocktail bars in Raval, the Marmalade failed to create an elegant yet unpretentious that attracts a diverse audience. Elegant furniture, with red brick walls and floors and murals, perfectly complements the delicious original cocktails menu. Meanwhile a beautiful matte black billiard table offers an opportunity to socialize.

There is also a room can be rented for private events. While the original charism of the pub hasn't changed thirsty travellers are still welcomed in traditional cabins with floor-to-ceiling partition pub , in its new incarnation the Shenanigans is definitely younger and livelier.

The bar offers more than 20 different beers, including the cheapest Guinness in Barcelona 4 euros a pint and even big craft such as choices Sierra Nevada Pale Ale , Brew Dog and Barcinos. On top of this, at Sheanigans there are five large TV screens to watch live sports, as well as billiards and Foosball tables to socialize.

La Cigale is a very popular bar, on two floors. The first resembles a coffee Parisien thanks to its round tables, the atmosphere lively and curious decorations, including vintage cars toy and religious icons.

The upper floor is more spacious and is filled with a deliciously chaotic mix of shelves, antique portraits, kitschy objects, furniture and sewing machines. The pub serves burgers the size of a soccer ball, Fresh fruit daiquiris, bottled craft beers, In addition to concerts, exhibitions and events.

The Loch Inn It's a great English pub in Barcelona that offers tasty food, best drinks and live sporting events, without hordes of drunken tourists and overly inflated prices. Located five minutes from Paral-lel, the Maumau Underground is a local popular with fashionable people, artists well dressed, students and young professionals who find themselves on the weekend, sipping gin and tonics or vintage cocktails, as Moscow Mules or Sailor Jerrys.

The bar is furnished with low white sofas, pop art, bamboo sticks and a ceiling of canvas. The background music is oriented on the funk and rare grooves. For movie fans, through Thursday night are organized screenings of short films. Start your night at a coffeehouse lowkey and charismatic in the lively Raval district where, with your drinking buddies, You can try a mojito perfectly mixed, a glass of Cava or a craft beer.

Then your local guide will take you on a tour of the best neighborhood bars, from the legendary Modernist hangout where Hemingway once drank Absinthe, to live music venues and other trendy bars, to end up dancing at a club for the rest of the night.

The evening costs 25 euros and includes a free cocktail and some delicious tapas. On this tour you will travel in a small group of most other 15 people with a guide at your disposal and a flexible itinerary, that hardly a tourist has the opportunity to visit. If you are looking for a real slice of Barcelona nightlife , There is nothing more authentic than this. The Barcelona Pub Crawl takes you on a tour of some of the best bars and pubs of the city, starting from The tour finishes as usual in one of best clubs in Barcelona , Depending on the night and the events scheduled.

In addition to, challenges of beer pong and body shots of vodka. The tour costs 20 euros 15 euro if you book on line and it includes not only your experienced guide, but as many as four free drinks and admission to the disco. The Pub Crawl is performed daily during the summer and 3 times a week during the winter.

Other Pub Crawl in Barcelona. An alternative to the other two tours offered. The Barcelona NightCard allows you to free entrance to 24 clubs in Barcelona.

The card is valid for 7 days, Costa 20 euro and includes a map with all the clubs: You can buy it Online or at the Office of tourism.

porno francais milf escort girl porto vecchio

Cela n'a aucun sens et je suis sûr que vous vous rendrez rapidement compte que ce n'est pas une mesure juste et efficace. Les terroristes n'utilisent pas des armes détenues légalement pour commettre leurs méfaits. Pourquoi donc durcir la réglementation qui ne s'appliquera qu'aux honnêtes citoyens? L'application en l'état de cette proposition qui se trompe de cible détournera un peu plus les citoyens d'une Europe de bureaucrates déconnectée de la vraie vie. Seules les dispositions concernant l'harmonisation des normes de neutralisation seraient à conserver la norme française étant d'ailleurs probablement la plus efficace.

En cette période troublée et chargée en émotion, il serait bon de ne pas profiter d'une situation suffisamment dure pour les victimes de ces actes odieux pour stigmatiser et amalgamer l'ensemble des possesseurs légaux d'armes à feu, dont certains ont du également souffrir de la perte d'un ou plusieurs proches lors de ces événements, avec les terroristes.

Les chasseurs, tireurs et collectionneurs d'armes, dont je fais partie, ne représentent en aucun cas un danger pour la démocratie et pour la sécurité publique, et vous le savez. Je doute fortement que les terroristes sévissant en France et ailleurs soient des chasseurs, des tireurs ou des collectionneurs d'armes et possédaient légalement celles ayant servi lors de cette tuerie.

Durcir encore plus la législation sur les armes à feu aura un impact sur ceux qui respectons les lois, mais aucun sur les terroristes qui se procurent des armes facilement, traversent les frontières avec facilement et s'en servent facilement. Et vous le savez. Alors Mesdames et Messieurs les Députés, soyez éclairés et ne vous trompez pas d'ennemis.

Nous ne sommes pas de cette espèce-là. En revanche, nous sommes tous électeurs. Hunters, shooters or firearms collectors, of whom I belong, are not of any danger for democracy or public safety, and you know it.

Toughten the law on firearms will have an impact on law-abiding firearms owners, but none on the terrorists who acquire guns easily, cross the borders with them easily and use them easily. And you know it. I strongly doubt that terrorists who acted in France or anywhere in the world were law-abiding hunters, shooters or firearms collectors and were legally owning the firearms they used to commit massacres. So, Ladies and Gentlemen of the European Parliament, be enlightened and do not be confused: However, we are all electors.

Je suis détenteur d'armes longues semi-automatiquesen accord avec notre législation. Lorsque je vois ce texte, j'ai l'impression d'être un terroriste. Je crains que la police ne viennent saisir mes armes alors que je n'ai commis aucune action delictueuse.

J'aimerais comprendre pourquoi l'union Européenne a décidé de combattre activement les honnêtes citoyens? Cette loi proposée dans l'urgence ne règlera pas le problème des armes automatiques qui pullulent dans les cités , une fois de plus le citoyen honnête est attaqué , cela ne fera que créer un marché parallèle et vous le savez très bien.

Rétablissez les frontières et durcissez la réponse pénale envers les criminels avant de vous attaquer aux citoyens.

Lorsque vous desarmez le citoyen, vous armez les criminels. Alors quel interet de les interdire aux particuliers detenteurs legaux c'est deja bien assez contraignant d'etre autorisé a les avoir Bonjour, Les tireurs licenciés et les chasseurs n'ont rien à voir avec le trafic d'armes qui alimente le circuit parallèle, toutes nos armes sont déclarées et conservées de manière sécurisée, et nous sommes non seulement déjà fichés mais avant de nous délivrer une détention il y a une enquête de police qui est faite.

De nouvelles limitations de détention d'armes pour les tireurs licenciés ne produiront aucun effet sur la sécurité car les tireurs licenciés ne sont en aucun cas les auteurs d'infraction à la législation ni les auteurs de crimes. En s'attaquant à la pratique du tir et en voulant instaurer de nouvelles limites, la commission européenne manque totalement de discernement et ne fait que s'attaquer à ceux dont elle devrait au contraire protéger les libertés, qui ont été déjà considérablement réduites.

Les seules personnes touchées par de nouvelles mesures seront les tireurs licenciés qui respectent les lois et sont connus des services de l'état, les malfaiteurs et terroristes eux ne vont pas acheter leurs armes dans des armureries et ne subissent aucun des contrôles tatillons auxquels les tireurs licenciés se soumettent. Je suis contre toute nouvelle limitation de nos libertés en matière d'acquisition, de détention d'armes semi-automatiques. Votre projet d'interdiction d'armes semi automatique pour le tir sportif est une grave atteinte à notre liberté.

Sa réalisation n'aidera aucunement à faire disparaître le marché noir d'armes. Bien au contraire , une décision aussi ennepte ne fera que le renforcer. La France a subi LE pire attentat terroriste de son histoire. Qui laissera des traces durant des années. Directive qui a pour unique but le désarmement d'honnêtes citoyen, et qui n'aura aucun impact sur la prévention contre le terrorisme, qui par définition, ne se fournit par via les canaux légaux.

Encore une fois, les institutions se trompent de cible et préfèrent prendre des mesures inutiles, mais faciles à mettre en oeuvre, pour produire un effet de communication.

Peu importe si cela impacte des libertés fondamentales, voire les Droits de l'Homme en général. Je me permets de citer la DDHC: Le but de toute association politique est la conservation des droits naturels et imprescriptibles de l'Homme. Ces droits sont la liberté, la propriété, la sûreté, et la résistance à l'oppression. Quelle est la prochaine étape? L'interdiction des livres jugés "subversifs"? La saisie des armes contondantes de tout autre type que "couteau à beurre"?

Allons jusqu'au bout du concept, interdisons tout véhicule motorisé, qui pourrait lui aussi être utilisé pour perpétrer des attentats. Voila pourquoi cette directive est ridicule. Ou sert un tout autre but que la protection des citoyens. Bonjour Au vu des dramatiques événements récents il apparaît que en aucune manière les armes employées dans ces abjectes actions terroristes ne provenaient d'une source légale ou avaient été acquises légalement.

Cette proposition ne sera donc préjudiciable qu'aux détenteurs et propriétaires d'armes respectueux des lois qui les acquierent et utilisent à des fins de loisirs ou sportives dans le respect des lois et règlements. Ce projet est vexatoire discriminant et surtout inefficace au possible contre les criminels qui ne font que peu de cas des lois. Il est également à mon sens fortement attentatoire au droit de propriété. Par honnêteté intellectuelle il serait intéressant de savoir combien d'armes acquises et détenues régulièrement ont été impliquées dans des actions criminelles En toute dernière considération le droit des peuples à être armés est un garant de la démocratie et un rempart contre l'arbitraire comme le démontrèrent les résistants au totalitarisme nazi.

Bonjour, Je vous écris ce commentaire, sans aucune certitude que quelqu'un le lira, afin de vous donner mon point de vue sur le sujet. Dans cette proposition sont mentionnés plusieurs points qui, je pense, sont trop restrictifs et liberticides. L'attaque du Thalys en France a montré de manière indéniable que la première ligne de défense, lorsqu'un crime ou un acte terroriste est en cours, sont les citoyens présents sur place.

La police ne pouvant être partout, dans chaque train, dans chaque wagon, dans chaque café ou dans chaque salle de concert. Je pense que, dans votre connaissance de la société, vous ne pouvez ignorer que votre objectif de restreindre l'accès aux armes aux citoyens exempts de condamnation ne fait que les désarmer et les transformer en cibles faciles et sans défense pour tous criminels ou terroristes souhaitant commettre leurs larcins.

Il est de notoriété publique que ces personnes, s'approvisionnant sur un marché parallèle n'ont que faire de nos lois qui régissent le marché légal. J'en viens à me demander si votre proposition ne se baserait pas sur des informations erronées qui vous seraient fourni par des gouvernements souhaitant désarmer sont peuple pour quelques raisons que ce soit.

Je vous prie de trouver ci-dessous, une liste non exhaustive de ces associations afin que vous puissiez les consulter. De cette proposition IP du 18 novembre, il ressort une évidente contradiction entre le prétexte invoqué l'usage d'armes automatiques illégales et l'objectif réel la prohibition des armes semi-automatiques légales.

Interdire les fusils semi-automatique aux citoyens respectueux des loi n'empechera pas les terroristes de se fournir en armes automatiques. Les explosifs sont interdits aux citoyens, pourtant ils en avaient sur eux et les ont utiliser. Il en est de meme avec les armes. This proposition is absolutely terrible.

Because of the semi-automatic ban, honest people, hunters, sport shooters, collectioneers will be spoliated and honest business, manufacturers and gun dealers will collapse. Terrorists use illegal automatic firearms, grenade and bombs. These are already prohibited in all European countries. Criminals do not follow laws. By banning semi-automatic rifles you will punish innocent people for facts they have no responsibility in.

And, in most European states, especially France, purchase of semi-automatic firearms is already strictly regulated. It requires an individual authorization from the Prefet high state authority for each firearm. And everything is recorded, the serial number of the gun is linked to the name of the owner. So there is no security improvement to wait from this proposition. You will just add injustice to drama. Honest firearm's owners can't accept to be collateral victims of the battle against terrorism.

Des fonctionnaires de la Commission européenne sont visiblement tentés d'instrumentaliser les dramatiques événements de ces derniers jours et de faire un énième amalgame douteux entre la détention légale d'armes semi-automatiques par des citoyens respectueux des lois et la détention illégale d'armes automatiques par des terroristes.

De cette proposition, il ressort au paragraphe 3 "What changes to the firearm directive is the Commission proposing today" une évidente contradiction entre le prétexte invoqué l'usage d'armes automatiques illégales et l'objectif réel la prohibition des armes semi-automatiques légales.

Les détenteurs d'armes légales, chasseurs, tireurs, collectionneurs comptent sur leur représentation au parlement européen pour ne pas devenir des victimes collatérales du terrorisme et résister à l'influence excessive des personnels non élus de la Commission européenne. Je suis contre l'interdction des armes semi automatiques. La législation en vigueur est suffisante pour assurer la protection de tous et ces armes ne sont utilisées que dans un cadre sportif.

Aucune mauvaise utilisation conduisant à des accidents du type de ceux que l'on voit aux États unis ne sont à déplorer en France. Quel est le rapport entre les jihadistes et les tireurs sportifs, chasseurs et collectionneurs d'armes qui eux respectent la législation en vigueur dans leur pays? Comme d'habitude vous allez au plus facile!!

Encore une initiative facile!! Plutôt que de s'occuper des vrais problèmes, la commission va emmerder les honnêtes citoyens! Tireurs sportifs, chasseurs, collectionneurs etc Pourriez-vous prendre la mesure du problème pour une fois et vous y attaquer serieusement. Notre ennemie ce n'est pas les citoyens Europeens mais les terroristes que vous nourrissez à nos frais! Les détenteurs d'armes légales — chasseurs, tireurs, collectionneurs — comptent sur leur représentation au Parlement européen pour ne pas devenir des victimes collatérales du terrorisme.

Les détenteurs d'armes légales — chasseurs, tireurs, collectionneurs — comptent sur leur représentation au Parlement européen pour ne pas devenir des victimes collatérales du terrorisme et résister à l'influence excessive des personnels non élus de la Commission européenne. Ils ont acheté légalement des armes qui représentent un capital financier important après un contrôle par tous les organismes de l'état. Ils ont contribué à maintenir des emplois. La législation actuelle sur les armes correspond à une loi juste et bien équilibrée.

Ce n'est pas en modifiant la loi sur les armes des citoyens que les états pourront contrôler le marché des armes non déclarées entre les mains des voyous, des trafiquants, des terroristes, dont les acquisitions n'ont été contrôlées et enregistrées. Les citoyens sont responsables de leurs armes et respectent la législation. L'accès aux armes rayées semi-automatiques est soumis en France à une réglementation draconienne autorisation préfectorale qui assure efficacement la sécurité.

La proportion de crimes et délits impliquant des armes de cette nature légalement détenues est en effet infinitésimale. Il est difficile de concevoir un régime légal plus restrictif encore pour ces armes, a moins de songer à en interdire purement et simplement l'acquisition et la détention.

Cependant, comme une telle mesure ne frapperait que les titulaires d'une autorisation préfectorale en bonne et due forme, et donc des citoyens au dessus de tout soupçon, l'impact en matière de sécurité publique serait rigoureusement nul. Il apparaît donc que le durcissement envisagé du régime légal des armes rayées semi-automatiques ne se justifie pas. La présente proposition semble d'avantage motivée par l'émotion suscitée par les tragiques événements récents additionnée de démagogie, que par l'approche impartiale et dépassionnée qui sied au bon gouvernement.

Bonjour, Je comprends parfaitement les préoccupations de la Commission sur le trafic des armes illégales, pour lutter contre le terrorisme notamment.

En revanche, en tant que pratiquant du tir sportif avec des armes semi-automatiques, je trouve particulièrement injuste de vouloir me priver de mes armes détenues légalement, alors même qu'il indiscutablement établit que les terroristes ou trafiquants d'armes ne s'approvisionnent jamais auprès des tireurs sportifs.

Je vous remercie donc de concentrer vos efforts sur les criminels et de ne pas déposséder les honnêtes citoyens, les premiers étant totalement distincts des seconds. La France vient d'être encore une fois victime de la barbarie. Certains sont visiblement tentés d'instrumentaliser ces dramatiques événements survenus ces derniers jours et de faire un énième amalgame douteux entre la détention légale d'armes semi-automatiques par des citoyens respectueux des lois et la détention illégale et l'utilisation par des terroristes contre des civils sans défense d'armes automatiques.

De cette proposition, il ressort une évidente contradiction entre le prétexte invoqué l'usage d'armes automatiques illégales et l'objectif réel la prohibition des armes semi-automatiques légales. Nous soutenons aussi la décision de nos responsables politiques de décréter l'état d'urgence, la situation l'imposait.

Mais nous devons rester très vigilants quant aux résultats de cet état d'urgence. En effet, en plus de bafouer notre honneur, cela marquerait une grave atteinte aux libertés individuelles sans aucun impact positif sur la sécurité des citoyens et serait le signe d'une dérive que nous ne pourrions pas accepter sans réaction.

Je refuse l'amalgame qui est fait entre les détenteurs légaux et les terroristes! Les mesures en discussion actuellement visants un durcissement de la réglementation des armes détenues à titre légal est une erreur fondementale. En effet chaque tireur sportif est dûment referencé, et ses armes parfaitement enregistrées auprès des autorités locales.

Aucun terroristes ou autre criminel n'a accé à ces armes enregistrées et destiné au tir sportif. Les supprimer ne règlera en rien les trafics permettant aux criminels de s'équiper. La législation actuelle sur la détention et l'acquisition d'armes me parrait suffisante, en effet, la méthode actuelle permet de contrôler efficacement les armes détenues mais surtout les personnes détenant les armes.

Par ailleurs, les malheureux évenement survenus cette année à Paris mettent en cause des armes automatiques donc illégales en France et détenues illégalement par des personnes ayant de mauvaises intentions. A mon sens, la priorité est donc le contrôle des armes détenues illégalement et non la répréhension des armes détenues légalement.

Bonjour, Il s'agit d'une mesure injuste et absurde à l'encontre d'honnêtes citoyens dont les règles leurs imposent déjà des contraintes pour autant justifiées. L'objectif de lutter contre le terrorisme, si c'est bien l'objectif recherché, ne sera pas atteint.

À l'heure actuelle où les citoyens ont du mal à faire confiance à la politique et à leurs représentants, interrogez vous plutôt sur votre rôle, votre fonctionnement et les attentes des citoyens. Les conséquences de l'interdiction de détention d'armes semi-automatique sera préjudiciable aux tireurs et professionnels associés alors que la volonté actuelle va plutôt dans le sens de l'unité nationales, du patriotisme et de l'entre aide. Pour ma part, cette mesure remettra en question tous les investissements que j'ai réalisé dans cette passion et sera désastreuse tant sur le plan économique que moral.

Mettre en place des mesures de contrôle et de limitation aurait été plus judicieux et approprié. La législation est suffisante. Les terroristes ne passent pas pr les voies légales. Les armes des terroristes sont des armes de contrebande. L'amalgame entre les terroristes et les citoyens respectueux des lois est une erreur insupportable. Les armes automatiques sont déjà interdites, les ceintures d'explosif aussi, cela ne gène en rien les terroristes.

Disarming citizens, hunters and athletes will not affect evil doers from comminting terror attacks, it will only limit our own freedom to live the lives we want. Anyone supporting this bill is defacto i liason with the terrorists behind the Patis attacks, as this is the exact response they were hoping for. Also, banning firearms based upon their looks is completely unserious. Would you ban cars because they look fast?

Stop punishing law abiding citizens. Vote no to this proposal. Investigate illegal arms trafficking instead if you want to fight terrorism. VOUS ne ferez rien car vous en avez aucuns control. The thought that criminal use of firearms will decrease if lawfull ownership is made more difficult or impossible is wrong.

Criminals will, by definition, not care about laws! And so far, almost all of the weapons used by criminals are smuggled in to the EU, not stolen or used by lawfull owners. La Législation Française sur la détention d'armes est réglementée je suis surpris de cette directive car les armes mises en causes sont tous des armes interdites sur notre territoire il faudrait renforcer les contrôles à nos frontières pour éviter cette proliférations de matériels en tous genres et ne pas faire des tireurs sportifs la cible innocente de ce texte.

I am a licensed hunter and competitive pistol shooter. In Denmark it is possible to own firearms , like the ones you want to ban, if you have the right permits in order. These permits takes a long time to get and is dependant on your criminal record and the general opinion of you based on your fellow shooters.

Legal firearms are very seldom used for criminal activities. But you are currently proposing a lawthat does nothing stop any illegal arms traffic and the terror it might cause. But instead makes life worse for those who are law biding citizens. You cannot stop terrorism by restricting legal gun ownership. Put all effort on the trafficking of arms instead, since everyone in Europe knows where all the weapons that terrorists use come from.

Please focus on stopping the easy access to illegal firearms within the EU, instead of depriving law abiding citizens of their semiautomatic firearms, used for hunting and sports shooting.

Bonjour Madame, Monsieur, A la lecture de cette proposition de loi, je suis choqué. Choqué de l'amalgame qui est fait entre tireurs sportifs et terroristes. Choqué de la récupération politique qui est faite de ces événements horribles qui touchent la France, et l'Europe, pour faire passer une loi pénalisant les tireurs sportifs et légaux.

Choqué de la méconnaissance de certains députés européens quant aux législations nationales sur la détention des armes Choqué que l'on puisse croire lutter contre le marché noir et le trafic d'armes en restreignant les droits des tireurs sportifs qui acquièrent leurs armes dans le respect des lois et réglementations actuellement en vigueur.

Je compte sur vous pour avoir la clairvoyance sur ces événements et ne pas tout confondre, amalgamer un sport très intéressant et riche de valeurs humaines, et les actes inhumains qui nous venons de vivre.

The proposed directive, will do nothing to inhibit terrorist and other criminals in acquiring firearms. It will only serve to punish legit firearms owners, sport shooters, and recreational shooters. I propose that the directive gets rejected immediately. Taking firearms from law abiding, innocent citizens is disgraceful. I fail to see how this action is anything other than working with the terrorists.

The terrorists work to take away our liberties and now so the EU parliament. Why is the proposal to ban semi-automatic firearms from civilian possession made from a panel of a anti-gun individuals. This is not democracy, this is a dictatorship of the terrorist kind. Where is the representative to the EU Parliament from those that are actually educated in the facts with regard to sports target shooting and civilian gun ownership?

I am an Hunter and competetive shooter. How will banning my legal semi-auto rifles kept in gunsafe prevent terror? All terrorists use illegal full auto rifles from the black market. Disarming law obeyding citizens can't possiby change the outcome of an terroristattack done by extremists.

They will get the guns and explosives anyway. I will await a good argument from you on this topic. This proposal is only going to accomplish one thing and one thing only. It's going to make what the terrorists did a victory for them. The weapons used in these terrorist attacks were not civilian weapons, and it was not law abiding citizens that carried out that gruesome attack.

Hundreds of thousands of Europeans are enjoying the freedom to shoot with their semi automatic weapons, if you push this directive through you're removing our freedom and that's exactly what the terrorists wants. Public authority SE - The feedback is published in an anonymous way. The European Commission proposal would decrease the Swedish Armed Forces capability in shooting, considering the fact that many officers and soldiers are active as civilian shooters with semi automatic weapons.

I cittadini onesti, con legittime licenze di possesso di armi sono il primo baluardo di difesa contro terroristi ed altri criminali, le proposte folli di cui si parla in questi giorni, non farebbero altro che fare un regalo ai terroristi ed aumentare ulteriormente la diffidenza ed ostilità nei confronti delle istituzioni europee.

Civilian legal ownership is not a problem related to terrorism or other problems in a society. Weapons laws and licencing should be a national matter. By accepting this proposal, a lot of hunters and sportshooters will be restricted in a way, that cannot be justified by facts. Legit weapon owners are not to blame for the weapons used by criminal activities.

Those weapons are bought on the black market, and that problem will not be solved, by restricting the ordinary law abiding citizen in its sports. Please consider that restricting our rights as citizens will not resolve the issue with illegal arms. Terrorists and criminals do not bother to register their weapons, they will always be able to acquire illegal guns.

Your proposition will not have any effect what so ever on the illegal guns circulating in the EU! Please take measures to fight illegal guns not the legal guns! Sicerely yours, Pia Clerté A compeitive shooter. Do not criminalize legal sporting guns, example semi-automatic guns, please. Criminalizing used machine is not the solution, lets focus on the reason and try to prevent reasons that mass-murder does not hapen.

The proposed amendment to the EU Gun Directive contains unconstitutional and immoral parts, mainly the categorical banning of legally owned firearm types. Terrorists use guns that are already illegal. Moreover, banning of, say, semi-automatic rifles that resemble service rifles would ruin Finnish defence doctrine that relies on active reservists.

It would ruin our motivation and our accumulated skillset. Go after illegal guns, go after criminals, go after terrorists, but do it right.

Harmonizing the deactivation standards is a big step, I congratulate the proposal for that - but it's among the only sane things in the paper. I've read about the legislation and I don't understand why good citizens cannot have semi auto guns. We are good people who are obeying the law and of nonharm to the society. It seemes very wrong to strip us from theese benefits when terrorists strike society. They dont use guns, they use illegaly smuggled weapons from Balkan or outside eu!

We are not to be blamed. This will continue until we have proper border controls. Removing the guns from law abiding citizens in eu, will only make things worse, many law enforcing officers and military personel train their shooting skills and develop within theese sports. We love our sports so mch and would not risk it, so we are very much law abiding citizens to be able to keep our sports.

It strikes very wrong when honsest good people are punished like this for no reason. Look at all statistics and you will see that legal guns are not a problem. Also look into theese countries which have already made what has been proposed here, and you will see that it has no effect!

Its just us who will be the ones who loses unfortunately. Im Swedish and we have strict rules for semi auto rifles. It takes 2 years and quite some skills to be able to aply for licence. And I think it shall take time and be hard to get licence, it's not for everyone to have, it should be regulated hard by the authorities as in sweden now! I dislike it beeing to easy to get a semi automatic rifle.

That should be same all within EU. Please consider this text, a well functioning society is a society where law abiding people can earn trust to be able to have shooting as a hobby.

A society where citizens are not being able to earn trust is a society which has to much in common with our neighbourghs in the east.

Au matin du 7 janvier , des terroristes attaquaient Charlie Hebdo avec des armes automatiques, illégales et non déclarées. Depuis cette date, l'Europe prépare une nouvelle législation pour interdire les armes à feu semi-automatiques aux citoyens respectueux des lois, bien que ce type d'armes ne soit jamais utilisé par des terroristes ou par le grand banditisme.

Ces derniers préfèrent utiliser des Kalashnikovs automatiques intraçables provenant des trafics d'armes. La nouvelle législation est dans les tuyaux depuis avril , mais c'est maintenant, le 18 novembre , à peine 5 jours après les derniers attentats à Paris, qu'elle sort. Les victimes de cette tragédie n'ont même pas encore été enterrés, les criminels pas encore tous arrêtés, l'enquête toujours en cours, que déjà, l'Europe annonce des mesures pour éviter qu'une nouvelle tragédie recommence.

Malheureusement, rien dans ces mesures n'auraient pu éviter ces attentats, puisque aucun d'eux n'ont été perpétrés avec les armes actuellement légales qui sont visées par cette directive.

Ce n'est pas logique, et c'est surtout extrêmement injuste. C'est injuste pour les victimes, c'est injuste pour les citoyens respectueux des lois qui perdent leurs propriété et leur passe-temps. Dites NON à la proposition de loi annoncée le 18 novembre N'interdisez pas les armes semi-automatiques sous le prétexte qu'elles "ressemblent aux armes automatiques".

Nous, les citoyens demandons que l'Europe se concentre sur les vrais problèmes: Voilà la situation actuelle, et cette nouvelle législation ne fait RIEN pour traiter ces problèmes.

S'attaquer aussi aux ventes via internet, c'est privé les citoyens d'une capcité de choix et mise en concurrence, en effet le nombre d'armurier en france étant faible et décroissant, supprimer le support d'internet ne ferait que créer des situation de monopole avec les dérives tarifaires qui peuvent en découller. Le armi le devono togliere ai terroristi e ai delinquenti e non agli onesti cittadini!!! Bonjour , ne faites pas l'erreur de l'Angleterre des années 90, ne vous trompez de cibles ce n'est pas en supprimant les armes officiels legalement détenues pour le tir sportif ,la chasse, et les collectionneurs honête,que vous allez régler le problème des armes illégales.

Ce sont ces cibles qu'il faut traquer. La commissione potrebbe quindi istituire una licenza unica europea, ovvero stabilire dei criteri uniformi ed oggettivi a cui gli Stati membri devono adeguarsi per il rilascio delle licenze di porto d'armi, uniformando anche i requisiti personali e le modalità di controllo. Ritengo del tutto inutili queste restrizioni perchè i criminali non acquistano le armi in armeria quindi tali manovre avrebbero effetti negativi solo sugli onesti cittadini a cui verrbbero sottratti beni del valore di migliaia di euro, sulle migliaia di imprese che lavorano in questo settore e su tutte le associazioni sportive che andrebbero ad estinguersi.

Cette proposition est une honte. Sous couvert de lutte contre le terrorisme vous voulez priver les tireurs sportifs de leur loisir. Vous savez très bien que les terroristes ou délinquants n'utilisent pas d'arme légale, donc renforcer des mesures déjà drastique exemple: Sachez que si cette proposition passe je n'hésiterais plus à voter pour les parties les plus anti-UE qu'il y a et que je militerais dorénavant contre cette dictature européenne qui nous privent de nos droits fondamentaux.

I strongly oppose the suggested legislation. It has absolutely no effect on illegal guns trade but destroys completely the basis for Finnish reservists possibilities for shooting practise.

If implemented, this will have a huge effect on EU popularity in Finland. I'm very concerned about the fact that this will destroy many sporting activities and also a finnish army reservist sport's that is crucial for the shooting skills of the finnish army reserve. Amongst the fact that this is based on totally flawed information i hope you revise the data that was collected by Fabio Marini and actually ask for real data from the governaments instead of an institute that has no relation to governaments or actual data.

Im also wondering why are you punishing the Most law abiding bunch of all, if you break the law and you have gun licenses they are revoked I. E Get into a fight in a bar so basicly your punishing Millions of law abiding citizen for the sake of populism?

The current proposal is done in great haste after several heinous acts of terrorism within the European Union. However, there is no direct link between legally owned firearms, i. Limiting the possibilities to own and use certain types of firearms will not put an end to terrorism or gun related crimes, it will mearly limit the citizens of the European Union to engage in sports and recreational activities.

The focus in the aftermath of the Paris attacks should be put on unravelling illegal gun trafficking, as this is the major source of illegal firearms. That being said, there are some good initiatives in the proposal, e. I do hope that the proposal is not implemented in its current form, as it will support the extremists acts by limiting the rights and possibilities of law abiding citizens of the European Union. I strongly believe that we should switch focus from citizen to states weapon market, if we want to stop the flow.

Moreover, just as EU is sponsoring and encouraging the spread such as the bls-d among citizen, so should be empowered the safety education which includes the possibility of react when in life-threating danger. Let us be hard targets, not cans in a carousel. Thank you Andrea Bray. I strongly oppose the proposal to change the way law abiding citizens are allowed to own weapons.

I am an active hunter and sport shooter and I use semi automatic weapons in both disciplines. The terrible deeds that were done in France has nothing to do with legal firearms and to ban legal ownership of these weapons will do absolutely nothing to prevent future terrorist acts! The only thing that will happen is that you punish regular people instead of the terrorists! Furthermore the proposal itself is hastily put together and filled with incorrect "facts".

I suggest it is thrown in the waste basket and a thorough and impartial investigation is put into placebtondetermjne how the EU can stop the flow of illegal weapons within its borders instead. That is where the real problem lies! Les citoyens Européens apprécieront eux mêmes la justesse de ces propositions. This act is neither proportionate nor does it have any valid purpose in the aspect to protect EU- citizens.

The terrible terror-crimes committed in Paris recently should not be used by politicians to infringe your citizens rights.

They did not use any legal fire arms. The British comedy act where they discuss politicians logic come to mind in this aspect.

Therefore we must ban all cats! The last 10 years here in Sweden only two 2! The influx of illegal firearms and the ease with which these weapons switch hands is the real problem. Don't just try to fool our citizens into thinking they are safe by taking the easy way with the only benefit of making the leadership look like they are taking action. Use the means we provide you to justified ends, not just to forbid the incredibly law abiding citizens who,shoot, hunt and compete of doing what they love.

These weapons may look scary and dangerous but most of them shoot the same rounds as the bolt action rifles most commonly used before. If the millions of people who own guns in the EU wanted to hurt one another they would have done so already, and will be able to do so with illegal firearms or other weapons. You see It's the mad men and terrorist that are the danger here, not the weapon in it self.

And certainly not the weapons way of chambering another round. And the citizens trust in it. Please don't alienate the millions of gunowners in the EU with these laws. Vote no to banning semi-automatic rifles! Non ritengo opportuno introdurre nuove misure restrittive per le armi da fuoco acquistabili e detenibili dai privati cittadini.

Le norme in vigore in Italia sono già sufficienti. Inoltre è fatto notorio che terroristi e delinquenti si procurano le armi - sempre più spesso di origine militare, quindi interdette ai comuni cittadini - sul mercato illegale. Ricordiamo tutti le parole dell'illuminista Cesare Beccaria, il quale nel suo testo "Dei delitti e delle pene" raccomandava appunto di non disarmare i cittadini onesti, proprio per non metterli alla mercè di qualunque malintenzionato.

Firearms Directive New directive is based definently on wrong approach to fight terrorism. Attacks in Paris had nothing to do with legal ownership of firearms. Terrorist and criminals do not care about laws. The directive suggests that law abiding citizens are criminals and are not qualified to own firearms. Banning firearms based on the looks is just plain stupid. EC wants to disarm it's citizens and for what?? Making us even easier targets for criminals.

Banning guns means the end of legimate, very controlled and very very SAFE shooting sports. I seriously hope that common sence will prevail. Does EU think that law abiding citizens are a threat to public safety? Right now the reasoning can only be in green leftwing and their phobia about firearms which are not based in anything else exept lies. I strongly oppose further restriction on law abiding citizens right to own firearms. Criminals will not send in their semi automatic firearms just because you restrict the law abiding citizens to own them!

Je suis certain que ces personnes n'ont absolument rien en commun mêe pas leurs armes et explosifs Thank you for possibility to give feedback. I am very concerned related to objectivity of the task force which prepared the proposal. Person who is in charge, explained to plenty of people that nothing has been done at the end of October, saying there will be formal hearing arranged later.

In reality, they were preparing the semi-auto ban behind curtain just waiting an opportunity to push it through without prober handling of the proposal. They have NOT contacted with associations who have knowledge about hunting, sport-shooting - just associations which want to ban firearms from law-abiding citizens. Also, the proposal is not such that it is clear. Current proposal is not clearly defining what is the so called banned firearm and what is not.

Intention is clearly to ban everything with this vague terminology. Such a poor preparation of directive must never be accepted - it will just cause more problem than what is intended to solve. I add one more issue that I need to highlight. I have put my own money upto It is not okay to me that there is threath that all will be collected away without compensation. Such stealing is not in anyway acceptable. This is last bit of trust towards EU if this will pass as proposed.

There are almous These people start demanding resignation from EU without prober handling of this proposal. Just as curiosity - We have heard that there is only two weeks period related to this directive update - so why this is open until to mid January ? I will add my feedback later - this as a first comment to you to review, best regards. While I agree on the main subject of the proposal, making it harder for criminals to get hold of weapons, I think there are several problems with it: The timing of the proposal seems to be abuse of the current situation, and not a democratic process.

After the recent events no politician will vote no to anything that limits weapons. The timing of this proposal suggests that the people behind it want to utilize this fact. I want EU proposals to decided upon by a democratic process, not by fear, or what ever is popular in current media. The proposal is written in a very inprecise manner. One almost thinks that it was written by someone who does not know anything about weapons. For example banning semi-automatic weapons would mean the end of many shooting sports.

While semi-automatic might sound bad to someone who does not know about weapons, basically all firearms are semi-automatic. The proposal also uses the inprecise wording that "military looking weapons" should be banned.

But how will this be determined? To me all rifles look the same, and all pistols look the same. Does this mean that all rifles and pistols should be banned? The proposal will probably have no effect on what it is trying to achive. Criminals almost never use weapons stolen from law abiding citizens. They simply have much better and easier options on the black market, where real military weapons, leftovers from wars, are readily available. The proposal also suggests things that does not make sense So the only people affected by this would be law abiding citizens.

Please review the proposal, and clear up what it is actually trying to achive and back it up by logic, and statistics. Focus on fixing the problems with reactivated weapons, instead of trying to stop all shooting sports and hunting in Europe. Io come si evince anche nella mia Page Porto d'Armi Libero Ma Responsabile sono per la difesa amministrata personalmente dai cittadini laddove lo stato non ne è capace e sostengo che se si hanno i requisiti per lo sportivo lo si hanno anche per il personale è che il diritto alla vita sia un diritto acquisito ed imprescindibile e non una concessione dello stato.

I think you should reconsider to go through and make a law that makes a lot of law abiding gun owners to stop With there hobby of shooting. There is in no way so that this law will decrease the illegal weapons to Flood into Europe.

You should focus on the illegal weapons and the criminals that uses them instead of punising they who are law abiding. Think twice and start with the real problem, criminals with illegal weapons. I am appalled how the EC is using the Terror attack in Paris, to crack down on legal gun owners. We did not commit these acts, so why are we the ones being targeted??? Simply banning what we own, what we bought with hard earned money means it becomes worthless the second this law is adopted.

How would you like it if your investment became worthless over night??? Give us more rights to have and carry weapons, do not take them out from our houses.

Most of us are sheep but also many are sheepdog and surely could prevent terrorist attack if carting weapons. You are on the wrong way. Terrorists do not use legal or stolen weapons; they just buy them on the black market. The directive proposal seems to be unnecessary and even outright harmful.

Common standards for deactivating firearms is the only part of the proposal I can fully agree with. Other parts, such as banning class A weapons, legally only held by strictly controlled gun collectors, and which have never been used in crime in Finland I can't say for other EU countries , for example, would destroy large amount of private property and historically valuable objects in Europe.

Even worse is banning of B7 class semi-automatic firearms, which would greatly harm sport shooters and in Finland's case, reservists, who use such weapons for practicing. Unless I'm mistaken, the proposal suggests confiscating these weapons without full compensation, which is even against Finnish constitution.

On the other hand, there could be some merit for having some standards how to convert ex-military full auto weapons to semiautomatics, so that they aren't too easy to convert back to full auto. Also, the five year maximum duration for licences with mandatory health checks when renewing licence would create unnecessary bureaucracy and expenses for gun owners.

I cittadini europei detentori di armi son persone rispettose della legge. Dear Europe make more strictly law or banning semiautomatic B7 is not the solution People have ears and eyes to hear and see where a uniform can't get! We operate in close protection, and in our small teams use intelligence listening, dogs, and teams that Ghost can move the territory without attracting attention!!

Unarmed citizen is a citizen dead. Hi, This proposal has no effect to real problem, which is illegal weapons. This only quits sport shooting in Europe, legal firearm owners are law abiding citizens and punishing them has no basis at all. Also this proposal has too loose definitions, what is actually "firearm which resembles something"? I am worried that these kind of proposals are done in great secrecy, it doesn't give very good image about European Commission.

This proposal should be withdrawn automatically. Please stop the proposed ban on semi-auto guns! Please use facts in law-making! Dont be a law-factory. I among otters enjoy recreational shooting both in competition and informal competitions. I have kids too and practice safe gun handling - even with toy guns. Don't be a signal law factory - there's enough of that and the laws are strict enough - punish those who violate instead of taking every responsible gun owner hostage Ancora una volta state penalizzando noi onesti cittadini europei detentori di armi legalmente detenute,con leggi sempre più restrittive a danno di noi cittadini paragonandoci ai peggiori criminali e terroristi che acquistano armi illegali dal mercato nero.

Questa non è la nostra europa,non è l'Europa che ci rappresenta,un europa che ci priva delle nostre passionie che ci toglie il diritto alla difesa. Ricordiamoci che siamo in una europa democratica e che la dittatura è deceduta da anni. I find the proposal for EU-wide regulations for marking of guns.

I oppose the criminalization of legal semi-auto weapons, used for sport shooting by civilian owners. We got our sports guns in legal way with all permissions and pay for them. Our guns are under control, by guns register in our own countries, and all owners were checked if we are able to have guns and use it for sport.

I think that prohibited for legal owners will not solve the terorist problems and threat! I am not responsible for your "multicultural" experiment gone wrong So no, you are not getting any of my belongings with significant value attached to them without a fight. I think EU parliament is not "legit" authority to even try to do so.

Fuck you and your "very important paper piling worthless non essential EU shit". Your opinion or point of view's are not needed nor wanted here in finland.

I strongly disagree with the proposed ban for semiautomatic rifles, because the licensed law abiding gun owners are not the threat. Instead most of them are army reservists especially in Finland and are practising with their own guns and at their own cost to be able to defend Finland. The proposed directive does not provide any solution against terrorism, but in stead is is very harmful for national security. The proposed ban would do a lot harm to sport shooting too practical shooting.

I am gun owner, active army reservist, sport shooter, training instructor for several decades now. Reclassifying self-loading semi-automatic firearms under Category A of the Firearms Directive, and banning their possession by private individuals, will cause serious harm to the Finnish national interest. I strongly believe that the directive should not be opened for inspection purposes. A prohibition on the possession of self-loading firearms by private individuals would have a detrimental effect on the activities of voluntary reservists and this would have a negative impact on national defence capability.

The Finnish defence model relies on a large standing reserve coupled with voluntary defence training, a significant part of which comprises the continued training and practice of shooting skills. Stricter directives that prohibit the civilian ownership of self-loading firearms would have a destablishing effect on these essential voluntary defence-related activities.

In addition to the disruptive effect on defence capability, a ban on the possession of self-loading firearms by private individuals would significantly impede other hunting and target shooting related activities including the Olympics.

Sports shooting, particularly practical pistol shooting e. Finland should also continue efforts to ensure the rights of registered firearms collectors to continue their hobby in the future. I agrees with the content of the reference document memorandum with regard to online commerce and distance selling.

The trading sector should not be set categorizing obstacles, however trade in firearms must take place within a framework of rules to prevent illegal trafficking. More over It is my opinion, that the memorandum presented does not define clear and concise reasons for the alleged pressure to change current laws in order to prohibit the possession of these firearms and their online sales.

Finland should obtain a more specific explanation from the European Union institutions regarding this matter. I share the widespread shock following the recent horrific terrorist attacks that took place in France. However these recent events cannot exclusively lead to changes in the regulations for all member states of the European Union. I strongly oppose any measures which would unjustly punish law-abiding and responsible firearms holders, by restricting or withdrawing their rights to practice their hobby.

The European Union and its member states should instead work together and focus their efforts to combat illicit arms trafficking and illegal possession of firearms. Banning registered collectors from possessing fully automatic firearms, or registered practical shooters and reservist shooters from possessing self-loading firearms that resemble military weapons, carries the risk that such firearms are erroneously reported lost or stolen, and end up on the illicit market.

Any amendment to the Directive has the potential to result in the expropriation of privately-held firearms. Expropriation of private property should result in current owners being fully compensated. The redemption cost has been estimated to run in to hundreds of millions of Euros. The allocation of a similar sized financial resource towards public safety, and the pan-European fight against illicit arms trafficking by the police, border guard and customer operations, would achieve a much greater effect.

I will also note that: Firearms classification according to the directives: Firearm safety is not created by the technical classification of different firearms; Firearms safety is achieved through legislature and executive law which focuses on the user and the demand for legitimate purpose.

The average age is around years and the audience is made up of a mix of fans of techno, revelers and tourists. The entrance ticket costs around 10 euros. Row 14 Autovia Castelldefels — C31, Km ,1, Viladecans, Barcelona Out of town, close to Barcelona Airport, the Row 14 is an outdoor disco and indoors, with a convertible roof and outdoor areas to relax. The club can accommodate up to people and the music is mostly techno proposal, House and drum and bass, with excellent international djs in console.

Reach the Row 14 It is not easy: The place is famous for its after-hours parties. The Be Cool is a medium-sized nightclub, with a main hall and a smaller room at the back.

The club is famous in the whole of Barcelona for its music quality, between House, techno, deep house and disco. Sometimes hosts famous djs. The place is located in the northern part of Barcelona, and is frequented by a public more interested in music that kept clothing.

The Otto Zutz is a large nightclub on three levels, located in an old factory. This is one of the few clubs in Barcelona where you can find this kind of music, and is popular with fans of the genre. The atmosphere is sophisticated and suited to flirt, but mostly for dancing.

The cost is around euros and the average age is about years. Recommended on Wednesday night. The club is a point of reference for the nightlife in Plaza real: Upstairs, It is located on Los Tarantos , which enacts flamenco. The latest two posts join forces to become club. You can find discounts on La Rambla. The Bling Bling is a disco with a select audience obligatory shirt , located in the Eixample area. The club offers, In addition to commercial music, even Latin American songs and house music in the second room.

Commercial music and Latin. Inside is a giant tent and some cubes ber dance. Small disco with commercial music and Spanish. The place frequented mainly by locals aged between 18 and the 25 years. The entry costs 10 euros. Elegant and fashionable Club that offers commercial music and Spanish. The place is frequented by Catalans. Inside there are two large dance floors. Great place if you love techno music, an obsession in Barcelona.

Diagonal, , Barcelona Open from Thursday to Saturday from The Bikini is a club with live music from the best of Barcelona. When the groups have finished playing, the space transforms into a nightclub where you can dance until the morning. The Interior is spacious and divided into two rooms, which sometimes are turned into a single large room, Thanks to the use of mobile partition walls. The average age ranges from 25 to 35 years and is elegant attire required.

Small club with live music and Latin American music. The entry costs euro and dress code is treated. South American Club, with few tourists. Latin American music, mainly bachata and salsa. The Macarena is a small but crowded disco, situated in the Centre of Barcelona, a short walk from La Rambla. Here you will find minimal music, House and techno, played by the best international djs. The Marula Café is a disco with funk music, soul and Latin.

Located in the heart of Barcelona, the place is the massive presence of tourists and sees an audience of older. There's a central dance floor with two bars. Good music selection gives the club an upbeat and friendly. The Sidecar is a small disco , located just off La Rambla and open daily. Inside you can find a dance floor, a bar and an area with stage. The music is varied and depends on the evening: The small basement attracts a young audience formed by locals and tourists, many of them come from the hostels located around Plaza Reial.

Located in the heart of the old town, the Harlem Jazz Club is one of the the most famous jazz clubs in Barcelona and offers jazz music, Funk and soul every night, before with live concerts and later, later in the evening, with international djs music for dancing until dawn.

The Club consists of a room with a bar and a dance floor at the back. The Harlem Jazz Club is a warm and inviting place with Dim lighting, cheap cocktails, but above all a warm.

The club is frequented by a mature audience and demanding. The club can get up to people and is very popular with locals and among many young tourists who come to Barcelona to immerse himself in his nightlife.

Situated on the beach of Barceloneta, the Club CDLC is a restaurant after dinner turns into a nightclub that hosts world famous djs. The club has a restaurant area overlooking the sea and a lounge area with comfortable chairs and sofas. The music ranges from RnB, to House up to electronic music and techno. The CDLC is one of the most exclusive clubs in Barcelona It attracts an international audience, young and hip, especially football players, rich tourists and yacht owners.

The kitchen is very respectable: The dishes prepared by our chef Alfonso Aranda blend the best of Oriental cuisine with Mediterranean tradition. Great place to live in the elegant and exclusive nightlife of Barcelona. One of the biggest clubs located around the beach of Barceloneta , the Catwalk is a disco that spans two floors.

Downstairs there is a large dance floor and a bar with seating, While upstairs there is a chill-out area where you can relax and chat. The club offers mainly House music and various genres like funky, handbag and vocal. The Catwalk is one of the the most famous nightclubs in Barcelona and often hosts international djs, including Eric Morillo, Roger Sanchez and The Unabombers.

The audience is international and fashionable: The Input former club The One is a large nightclub located at Poble Espanyol , which offers mostly techno music, minimal, House or electro. People come here to dance till dawn. Alternative rock music club and concerts of experimental bands. Disco located in Carrer de Numancia , attended by Catalans and tourists.

Disco where you can dance to the music of Latin America, like salsa, merengue and pachanga. Great place if you want to avoid the crowded tourist nightclubs on the beach. Frequented mainly by locals. Disco located near de La Rambla. Open from , Les Enfants Club is one of the oldest clubs in the scene of Barcelona nightlife.

The club is centrally located, near La Rambla. Inside there are two dance floors: Club composed of two environments: On the dancefloor to dance to the beat of techno and House music, While the cocktail bar offers softer tones and more funky, with local djs.

The KER is dedicated to lovers of electronic music and aims to recreate the warm and friendly atmosphere that has defined the culture of the club in the years ' 70 and ' The Mac Arena Mar is a beach club in Ibiza style, situated on the sea front, offering electro-House music. The place is famous for the events of Sunday. In addition to, There is free admission all night. During the day, the Mac Arena It's also a great place to eat by the sea, with a tasty menu and a great wine list.

Here you can find innovative cuisine, succulent delicious cocktails to SIP during the afternoon on the terraces along the pier. The cocktail bar upstairs serves Teppanyaki grilled with mojitos expertly prepared. Sophisticated place geared to pre-clubbing. Huge pub located a short distance from the Razzmatazz where can you buy cheap sangria and beer! Inside there are large tables, a billiard room and a concert hall.

The pub is packed with people every night, and is frequented by locals and tourists alike. Here you can dance and meet other people without difficulty! Be careful because there are two Oveja Negra , one located at Carrer Sitges 5, small and nothing that, While the second, located near the Razzmatazz at carrer de Zamora 78, is the best!

Former confectionery modernist style and frequented mainly by artists and intellectuals. La Bolsa is an original pub, whose peculiarities are the prices of drinks that, as in the stock market, increase and decrease depending on demand. The place is still cheap and is frequented mainly by Catalans.

Quiet pub with great atmosphere: Pubs offering shots of alcohol in 1,80 euro and a liter of cocktails only 10 euros. Although the place is small, It is still very popular and is perfect to enjoy a pre-fun night. Situated on the seafront between the clubs Shôko and Sotavento, the Barcelona attractions is, as the name suggests, a bar with interiors covered with ice and the constant temperature of -5 degrees!

To enter you have to pay 15 euro and have included a jacket, a pair of gloves and a drink. This place is for you if you want to proovare the experience of drinking your cocktail while sitting on chairs made of ice.

The Miramelindo is one of the busiest and largest among the bars located on Passeig del Born , and is characterized by large wooden beams supporting the ceiling. The place is very busy on weekends, When hordes of locals descend to party and enjoy the homemade cocktails at low price. Located in the Raval area, in what was once the Chinese quarter, the Bar Pastis is one of the historic bars of Barcelona. The place is very small and hosts live concerts ranging from Brazilian music, that argentina and French.

Once you have ordered your drink you can relax on one of the leather chairs and watch the world go by on the Rambla, legendary artery of the city.

The soundtrack ranges from French pop, to jazz and is designed to provide moments of relaxation. Despite its prime location at the top of the legendary La Rambla, It's actually surprisingly easy to walk past the Boadas without noticing its distinctive red doors, which at least saved him from being packed with tourists in shorts and sandals.

Actually, This modest cocktail lounge is open from , which makes it the oldest cocktail bar in Spain. The bar was founded by the eponymous Miguel Boadas , who first learned the art of cocktails at the bar The Floridita of Havana Cuba at that time was known as Ibiza to present day. And like in the years ' 30, even today the bartenders of Boadas shake and mix classic drinks from behind the counter, dressed in Tuxedo and bow ties.

Consisting of huge space just off Plaza Catalunya , the Belushi is a modern and airy bar, London-style more than a typical Catalan pub. By day the place is frequented by young people while taking a break from shopping to enjoy fresh drinks on comfy couches tobacco color, or take a coffee on the terrace. In the evening there is live music and live sports. The nearby Youth Hostel gathers a large clientele that comes to Belushi to SIP the pitchers of sangria at less than 10 euro and take advantage of special offers on beers.

This is also a great place to party in the midst of an international crowd. A wide range of beers 13 on tap, In addition to other varieties in bottles is completed by a menu of delicious home cooked meals, grilled chicken with creamy sauce to Irish whiskey, their famous Irish breakfast and the Sunday roast. As you would expect from any self-respecting Irish pub, There is plenty of sporting events broadcast live, including football, ice hockey and rugby.

Very popular is also their hilarious weekly tournament Beer Pong , held every Thursday from The Flaherty continuously hosts parties and live music events and promotions on drinks. The main theme of Cat Bar are, as the name suggests, cats: A watch with the face of a huge cat is hanging on a wall, While cheap plastic felines from China shake their legs in front of you, and all around are placed various photos and memorabilia depicting always cats that embellish the rest of the bar.

The Cat Bar is also the only vegan restaurant in Barcelona , and the menu includes delicious tortillas and vegan quiche secret recipe! It is also possible to order four different types of craft beer. One of the most sophisticated cocktail bars in Raval, the Marmalade failed to create an elegant yet unpretentious that attracts a diverse audience. Elegant furniture, with red brick walls and floors and murals, perfectly complements the delicious original cocktails menu.

Meanwhile a beautiful matte black billiard table offers an opportunity to socialize. There is also a room can be rented for private events.

While the original charism of the pub hasn't changed thirsty travellers are still welcomed in traditional cabins with floor-to-ceiling partition pub , in its new incarnation the Shenanigans is definitely younger and livelier. The bar offers more than 20 different beers, including the cheapest Guinness in Barcelona 4 euros a pint and even big craft such as choices Sierra Nevada Pale Ale , Brew Dog and Barcinos.

2 Replies to “Porno francais milf escort girl porto vecchio”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *